Mitsubishi F-2

The reason might be that some vehicles have more detailed specifications than others.
I can’t say anything concrete tho because you didn’t list any examples and ontop of that my knowledge about tanks is rather limited.

Every nation’s vehicles underperform in some way or another be it the EF with its poorly working radar or the Mig29 with an absolutely butchered flight model

Pointing your finger at others and crying about bias just makes that part of the community dislike you, simply because you didn’t know better.

With prototypes Gaijin has magical words “the form in which it was most likely adopted”. And using these words they can add or remove anything they want.

Yes so they added Guns to the Kikka
and an IRST to the Yak141 which was in service on all Russian fighters at the time

But at the same time didn’t give the Yak141 all the armament it was planned to have.

Spoiler

The underlying problem of this discussion isn’t how or what they implement to paper vehicles but comparing them to production vehicles

Pointing out bias isn’t ‘whining’—it’s holding devs accountable. The community should demand fairness, not excuse double standards because ‘everyone has problems. If Gaijin applied the same scrutiny to all nations (e.g., requiring equal proof for armor values, flight models, or reload rates), no one would complain. But when certain trees consistently get ‘benefit of the doubt’ while others face hyper-skepticism, calling it out isn’t ‘toxicity’—it’s basic criticism. Fine, I won’t waste time arguing with those who pretend not to see the truth. But just know this—Gaijin’s hypocrisy is obvious to anyone who actually looks.

4 Likes

Did already many times, they just ignored it

It didn’t get all the weapon because of balance reasons. I was just pointing, that Gaijin can implement prototypes in any way they want.

But even if we want to compare just service planes, there is A LOT of problems with Gaijins hypocrisy. All F-5s got flares because “it’s possible to install them”. Why not all F-104s got flares then (ROC F-104G doesn’t have them even when it has them in reality!)? Why french F-100D is stuck with AIM-9B, while american one can carry AIM-9E? Why Jaguars or J32A got chaff pod, while T-2/F-1 didn’t? And so on and so on.

And there is a lot of problems with Gaijins transparency. We don’t know what exactly they use to set stats of their vehicles

8 Likes

:Nerd emoji: Yak-141 is not even real name of it

Just ignored? Sometimes they really just ignore, and that’s a problem we can’t fix, unfortunately. But more often it’s just a bad bugreport

What do you want me to use

Yak-41,
Freestyle or
Yak-41 Freestyle?

Maybe even
Яковлев Як-141or
Яковлев Як-41

IMG_2347

2 Likes

Yep, i even made a bug report and others included further information, and to our amaze… it once again got ignored

Just send the link to the report

Took them 2 years to fix the type 10s tracks xD

1 Like

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/TyHjKYB9sBbO

Heres one i made about the GCS1 (for japanese domestic aircraft) and aam3 for ej kai

1 Like

Not to mention the T2 and F1 dont have their ASM1s and T2 missing its quad bomb rack on the belly and twin bomb pylon on the wing (used to have on wing but gaijin removed it for some random reason)

Plus F104J missing its bomb loadout too

1 Like

I can tell you why it didn’t get accepted

For the same reason the F4f Ice doesn’t have the Iris-T

And the reason is balancing, giving it the AAM3 would increase its br.
The same goes for the AAM5 whenever it gets added to the game

Do you really want to fly a phantom at 12.7?

1 Like

It was also pitched to move it up in BR to 12.7 or 13.0 even (wouldnt mind no change for me honestly)

Let me tell you from experience,
There is nothing worse than flying a phantom at 13.0

Yak-41 is as far from Yak-41M we got in game as YF-16A to F-16AJ, these are equally “fake” planes. It doesn’t make them bad, we play a game and there nothing bad of having unrealised projects or unimplemented modifications.

I have no issues, i take it to 14.0 and still do fine

Might do it again later on actually, thanks for that :)