Answer from Yusei Misumoto, author of 「全力解説 F-2」who also was part of F-2 developmet team back then, Q2 is in regard of J/AAQ-2, take what you want from it
3 Likes
it doesnt weigh anything, flightmodel uses flighmodel mass, this is just statcard only suspended ordinance matters
We dont have combined Sensor Fusion between primary sensors such as IRST and Radar yet. That’s not unique. Both EFT and Rafale are exactly the same.
My reading of the response is the report lacks the substantive evidence needed to action the request. RWR used in testing how that impacts other RWRs what their capabilities are in relation to the missile in question.
1 Like
Document in question has nothing to do with GCAP and pre-dates even I3
1 Like
Yes they do.
They may have limited how much the flaps deflect when not in takeoff/landing mode, but they most definitely still clip. They have yet to adjust the size and positions of the pylons and launch rails.
The AAM-4 pylons should be just barely taller the fuel tank pylon- if at all, and the launch rails shorter.
1 Like
Hope they fix that because you’re switching between them twice now.
Stock missile bug all over again.
1 Like
Well, my technical Japanese not nearly good enough to fully translate it, but I think it is just next step in research with part 3 focusing on same capabilitis provided by existing sensor system
2 Likes
This report is also made 3 years later, but I guess non of this actually matters since game lacks sensor fusion framework for main sensors anyway
2 Likes
8 Likes
For clarity would you mind marking these spots on an image?
Not always, IRIS-T SLM range report has been denied at first even with correct manufacturer brochure and data provided that current implementation does not reach its effective range. I guess it depends on the moderator and how much in detail they go through the data provided by players
I’ve got it logged internally;
“[germ_iris_slm_launcher] Maximum Range Too Low”
6 Likes
I see that was the case. Sorry for replying to that. I’ll delete it because it’s embarrassing.
You might be actually right overall and you seem to be done fair bit of research, I don’t know Japanese enough to just read all the documents and confirm if all this tests was done just for I3/F-X or it is something F-2 can do natively and they wanted to see difference in perfomance between baseline F-2 and F-2 with “future” sensors. Tbf it is probably something only J-MoD/ATLA can confirm or deny
But this is way above what individual players can do and either DMM or/ and Gaijin directly should get involved with
I’ve seen the J/APG-2 identify things that look to be in a similar way to TWS but it shows all of it all at once on the Dev server if that’s what that refers to-