If ASEAN subtree really added to Japan there a tons of plane that using AIM-120C-7, other than F-15SG we have Indo F-16A, Malaysia F/A-18 C/D, Japan itself also got AIM-120C-7 too but just not sure is it used on F-2 or just F-15J
Sudden question: can F-2 carry more than 4 IR missiles?
Nope
Sad. I wanna try it in SQBs. AAM-4 are not that useful there. More AAM-3 would be nice to have
I can use the opportunity to catch up with you: Could you bring a roundup of the things that have been sent in for suggestions regarding F-2.?
(I’m already following the repots, it would be nice to list the ones that weren’t passed on to the devs)
Don’t forget Yak-141, F-16AJ, Maus, Heavy tank no.6… The list goes on…
Since a lot of suggestions are being deflected on the community bug reporting page, I went ahead and made a Dev Server thread for people to show their support in maybe getting more features added to the F-2A
(yes, I am aware that some of the suggestions posted might be ahistorical, but I’m remaining impartial and leaving all options open to suggestion)
Thailand itself has both C-5 and C-7 for gripen or F-16a eMLU for other options
for BVR (which is the meta ig), its better to have 6+ Missiles so you can defend against incoming Fox 3s or overwhelm an enemy. but yeah i use 4+4 on the F-15J(M) too
Sniper model now dev, still not usable
FM changes
Spoiler
Spoiler
Its an insignificant nerf to the sustained turn rate (less than half a degree per second), whats more noticable is that the plane loses more energy in a turn now. In exchange, we get more aoa and +1G of pull. Flaperons now deploy with pitch inputs too.
The pylons now also don’t clip with the flaperons anymore.
Zero of those vehicles are service vehicles, thus not comparable to F-2A.
The eye of sauron is nothing against this combination XD
What is and isn’t a valid source can vary depending on what Gaijin wants it to be. Sometimes it’s just a ‘‘obvious marketing lie’’, sometimes it is a worthy source.
Double pods truly Japanese technology XD
question: does the F-2 have a missle approach warning system?
That is why I criticize 6 ASM and argue for 6 MRM: it is arbitrary after all.
By what can be found online J/ASQ-2 IEWS is capable of detecting, classifying and autonomosly defending from incoming threats but since system is classified there are not “enough” proof for gaijin