Well, thats the answer. I think they should just bring AAM-4 closer in perfomance to AIM-120C-5 to which it is mostly compared and call it a day, and I think on this one they should just believe official statements becasue finding manuals on missile still in active service that is not being exported and not classified is borderline impossible and we can make assumption for balance sake. AESA radars have nothing to do below 14.0 unless plane itslef is really not up to day (like Kfir C.10)
6 Likes
Janes and their multiple studies are being brought up a lot in reports for all sorts of things, and as far as I can tell information in their books are often matches actual primary sources so I think for most modern vehicles that are still in active service developers should just use their information unless other primary sources present, it would make develpment of new vehicles and work with community easier as we would have an acceptable middle ground. Also might help with reducing amount of classified files leaks. Developers, being a big company, might also work with Janes directly and learn about their sources
Janes | Open Source Defence and Security Intelligence
1 Like
bruh
2 Likes
Oh that explains the diferences i saw with the ASM-1 suggestion
Acording to it, it should have more explosive mass and he warhead
Are there any real info abt asm-1 and -2 online, what we got now is a copypaste of some random asm🫠
The suggestions for both on this forum
4 Likes
Hey, can anyone confirm an example of an F-2 fighter carrying the original AAM-4 (not the AAM-4B)? Front-line F-2 units are supposed to use only the AAM-4B as their ARH missile. (I know the ADTW test aircraft have carried the earlier AAM-4, though.)
Is anyone else getting a fuel bug on the dev server?
and why did the developers add asm missiles at all, if they can’t work on ground equipment … in simulator battles, probably.
The information I found indicates that the September 2019 issue of Koku-Fan (航空ファン) magazine contains an article about the F-2’s RWR, which suggests that the F-2’s RWR has capabilities similar to a Missile Approach Warning System (MAWS). Could anyone help locate a scanned image or photo of that specific magazine article? This would provide clearer evidence for official evaluation
The numbers are just wrong. It’s whatever fuel you take in minutes x2 from what I’ve seen.
This is probably either refering to the 3d direction finding RWR test, or some sensor fusion thing.
An ADTW F-2 was tested with some slight modifications to allow its existing RWR to have direction finding capabilitiers, which can detect and slave weapons to a 3d RWR lock.
The other thing it could be is we do beleive the F-2 may have a MAWS, maybe, with a heavy pinch of salt. IIRC, there is a J/APQ-4, which is believed to be on the F-2. However the documents stating what it does are classified, but we do know the J/APQ-1 on the F-15JM to be a radar based MAWS.
Theres also stuff about the primary radar identifying and reacting to incoming missiles IIRC, but im not aware of if its to an extent of fully functioning with MAWS, or if its specifically for AAM-4 missile interdictions.
3 Likes
For those interested, single turn comparison between the F-2 and the Eurocanards (As of 2.46.0.16 on the dev server). All planes are spaded with expert crew, on min fuel and have 2 x IR missiles
Spoiler
In a vertical loop
Spoiler
Personal Observations
Spoiler
From flying around in test flight, F-2 feels very responsive, more so than the 2-3 ton lighter gripen because of the great roll rate. It has very good energy retention, only beaten here by the Typhoon (expected because of its massive TWR). The instructor on the F-2 is also very generous, at low altitudes in stalls you maintain control even as low as 80kph before the instructor forces the nose down. In vertical loops the F-2 still compares favourably even with its comparitively low TWR, although this is an area where the eurocanards dominate when sustained.
In a sustained horizontal turn while maintaining about 100m altitude, full elevator on mouse aim brings the F-2 down to ~400kph, the Typhoon and Rafale to ~360, the Gripen to ~340. If you look at the graphs on Statshark the F-2 holds nearly a 1*/s turn rate advantage against the Rafale and Gripen at these speeds, the Typhoon is the only top tier jet that keeps up. Looking at the other SEP lines the F-2 is very competetive under 500kph and is going to be one of the best dogfighters at top tier if the fm stays as it is.
It flies almost how I expected it to be and is most definitely worth the wait.
*All planes have instructor mode enabled, Gripen has simulator pull in mouse aim however so it is probably more accurate to keep instructor mode disabled for the Gripen in Statshark when looking up its EM diagram.
6 Likes
How did you get that information? According to the table of contents of the September 2019 issue of Kōkū Fan, the only F-2 article seems to be about its first participation in exercises in Alaska. Are you sure you mean the September 2019 issue?
1 Like
I’m curious to see what duelers end up doing but I’m every excited to see this as it’s what I was hoping for with the F-2
3 Likes
令和４年度調達予定品目（中央調達分）
電子戦試験装置（その 1）の製造
The J/ASQ-2 Integrated Electronic Warfare System (IEWS) is also being developed by Mitsubishi Electric, and the electronic support device (ESM), electronic jamming device (ECM), and chaff flare dispenser will be integrated with a dedicated electronic warfare controller (EWC), and will systematically implement everything from receiving threat radio waves to identifying and assessing threat levels, and implementing countermeasures.
5 Likes
J11B is NOT 14.0 material and is fine at 13.7
1 Like
unfortunately Gaijin has stated that currently the requirements for “maneuver mode” is if the devs want to add it or not. whether or not an aircraft actually has an AOA limiter or the ability to turn it off currently has no effect on if it’s added in game.
It seems I might have been mistaken, but I believe there was indeed an interview with a Mitsubishi designer in that magazine back in 2019. Could you help me find it? Thank you! The title appears to be: “F-2 Support Fighter: Technical Analysis of the Final Production Model” （日本語原題：「F-2支援戦闘機 最終生産号の技術検証」）