Yup, we got the Modernized MSIP, means it should be called “F-15MJ” or “F-15J(M)”
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/6htEt6yUsEsr
Yup, we got the Modernized MSIP, means it should be called “F-15MJ” or “F-15J(M)”
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/6htEt6yUsEsr
No, just noticed it by myself. These should be F100-IHI-220E, which were installed with J-MSIP, so even before the MTDP stuff was installed (e.g. JHMCS → HMD).
Internally bug report it?
You hope gaijin recall on tech tree and stat card F-15J KAI → F-15J(M) in dev server ?
No MAWS?
Japan should get the F-16C/J
Wrong engines report
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/aLbimL4Ol0hw
Wrong name report
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/6htEt6yUsEsr
Thats Mitsubishi F-2 (and off-topic)
I like to post them then put them in the suggestion box
So it does partially work or is it just for looks right now?
Also it looks like they’re basing it off this plane?
I hope they add it for both sides anyway tho…
Friend shot a aim 9m at me from ~3km and nothing came up so I assume its for show.
Good catch, seems like you are right but are the other F-15MJ like this too? If not maybe its better to model it after the average F-15MJ.
Plenty have been made
I guess they think it would be too strong if it had a MAWS so haven’t modeled it for top tier planes. I know F-111 has one but it’s more of a bomber.
Honestly I don’t know, otherwise I’d bug report it myself to suggest, but I think they did this because it’s easier to copy paste from the F-15C for US? Worth a shot I suppose.
haha i think its more of a WIP than anything, J11A and F15C are also missing MAWS. I doubt its ill intent, at least for now
recent france f16s have maws
Ah, then it’s probably a placeholder we hope.
while browsing through warthunder issues, I came upon this bug report Community Bug Reporting System
What concerns me is that the AAM-4 will go the way of the type 93, being left behind with the old model and stats, while the newer models of other missiles surpass it
What sort of sources are available that can be used to support the AAM-4 to be at least equal to the other missiles
I was wondering that myself. I’d imagine whatever the AIM-120s get, by default, the AAM-4 should get, but I have no sources or information.
This sheet has the datamined info of the current ARHs, looks like the AIM-120C-5 was added at some point.