Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-35 Blue 154 Technology demonstrator (9-15D): Showing off the Fulcrums potential

[Would you like to see this in-game?]
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

MiG-35 Technology demonstrator

Aircraft info:

Spoiler

The MiG-35 is a 4++ generation multi role fighter made by the RAC as a technology demonstrator built of a 9.15 airframe by converting the previous MiG-29M2 MRCA tender in 2007. When the aircraft was upgraded and renamed MiG-35 it received numerous upgrades to its engines, avionics and electronics including the installation of the Zhuk-AE AESA radar. MiG-35 TD 9.15 differs from the other MiG-35s with it being the only one built of the 9.15 airframe while all other MiG-35s like the two 9.61/9.67 Indian MiG-35 test units and the newest VKS MiG-35s called 9.41SR/9.47SR are built off the 9.41/9.47 MiG-29K airframes. The 9.15 MiG-35 difference from the 9.41/9.47 MiG-35 is that the 9.15 MiG-35 is the only unit with the built in IRST pod and it lacks the larger flaps and enlarged LERX that the 9.61/9.67 and 9.41SR/9.47SR MiG-35 inherited from the 9.41/9.47 MiG-29K.

Aircraft history:

Spoiler

The MiG-35 TD (technology demonstrator) history starts in 2007 when Russia decided to enter the Indian medium multi role combat aircraft by converting the previous MiG-29M2 demonstrator in to the MiG-35 since an demonstration prototype was needed, it received numerous upgrades to its engines, avionics and electronics including the installation of the Zhuk-AE AESA radar and improved IRST systems including an integrated IRST targeting pod on the underside. The MiG-35 TD would be showed to the public for the first time at the Aero India show in 2007, showcasing what the brand new MiG-35 platform would offer to potential customers. Unlike the 9.61/9.67MiG-35 units that would be used in the tests and evaluation for the MMRCA the 9.15 MiG-35 was only intended to serve as an technology demonstrator and would continue to do so appearing at airshows in to the early 2010s in Russia.

Aircraft specifications:

Spoiler

Dimensions and size:

  • Lenght: 17,2m
  • Wing span: 11,36m
  • Wing area: 38m²
  • Height: 4,7m

Weight:

  • Standard take off weight: 17800kg
  • Maximum take off weight: 23500kg

Engine output and flight performance:

  • Top speed near ground: 1400km/h
  • Top speed at altitude: 2100km/h
  • Service ceilling: 17500m
  • Engines: RD-33MK 2x
  • Full afterburner engine output: 9000 kgf 2x (Bench thrust)
  • Max dry thrust output: 5600 Kgf 2x (Bench thrust)

Onboard avioncs and other equipment:

  • Radar: FGA-29 Zhuk-AE AESA
  • RWR: L-150
  • IRST: OLS-UE, With additional OLS-K mounted underneath the aircraft
  • MAW: I-222 SOAR MAW
  • LWS: SOLO LWS system
  • Countermeasures: 2x BVP-60-26 CM dispensers mounted inside the dorsal spine although not mounted on this 9.15 was intended to be mounted on all earlier 9.15 variants, explained more below (120x regular caliber CM)
  • Helmet system: НСЦИ-КОС HMDS

Additional specifications about onboard equipment:

Zhuk-AE AESA radar:


image.translated (1)

OLS-UE IRST, OLS-K IRST, SOLO LWS and SOAR MAW:



image

Video talking about the onboard optical station:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfYwfBPeSMw

RD-33MK Engine:
image

Countermeasure dispensers:

When looking at images at MiG-35 9.15 blue 154 it appears to be no flare/chaff countermeasures dispensers mounted when looking at the jet itself, normally on a 9.41/61 version MiG-29/35 it would be mounted under the vertical stabilizers next to the engines either with an BVP-16-50 or BVP-32-50 cassettes.

MiG-35 9.15 blue 154 lacking said countermeasures dispensers
image

And on a 9.15 airframe they are intended to use 2x BVP-60-26 CM dispensers to be mounted inside the dorsal spine on each side totaling 120x CM, according to this drawing from the Mikoyan MiG-29 Fulcrum manual book shows their intended placement:
image

When comparing the drawing from the Mikoyan MiG-29 Fulcrum manual book they are still present at the same place at blue 154 since its a 9.15 airframe:
image

Armament:

Spoiler

Main armament:

  • GSH-30-1
  • 9 total hardpoints

Additional equipment that can be mounted:

  • 3x drop tanks

Air to air missile:

  • 6x R-77/77-1
  • 2x R-27R/ER
  • 2x R-27T/ET
  • 8x R-73/R-74M

Air to ground missile:

  • 4x Kh-29TE/TD/L
  • 4x Kh-38ML/MT/MA/MK
  • 4x Kh-59M2/MK/MK2
  • 2x 3M-14AE

Anti ship missile:

  • 4x Kh-31A
  • 4x Kh-35
  • 4x Kh-35U

Anti radiation missile:

  • 4x Kh-31P
  • 4x Kh-31PD

Guided bombs:

  • 4x KAB-250 series of bombs
  • 4x KAB-500 series of bombs
  • 2x KAB-1500 series of bombs

Unguided rockets:

  • 4x B-8M1 rocket pods
  • 4x S-24B rockets

Standard bombs:

  • FAB-250
  • FAB-500

image

Gallery:

Spoiler

image












image




image
image
image

Sources:

Spoiler
11 Likes

Oh it made it through nice

Nah no more bias trash

YES FINALLY, thank god they accepted this one

4 Likes

+1, 1 billion Mig-29s

1 Like

Finally a new USSR 4++ sugestion and a good one, but seeing it can’t R-37m is a bit sad.
+1

Please give it the black camo demo skin

2 Likes

Would have to be a unhistorical skin tho, since that mig-35 demonstrator is built from the 9.41S MiG-29M blue 741 with it receiving new vertical stabilizers and a AESA radar before it was converted back to MiG-29M later

1 Like

Company says it can but no solid proof of it.

1 Like

Seems interesting. What BR would you place it at?

32 countermeasure monster

14.0 or 13.7 with no aesa radar

Shit even 13.3 with only 6 fox3 rule of gaijin

Depends a bit on how they model it if they feel like adding it with R-77-1s it could go to 14.0 since it has relatively low ARH count of only 6 max

With MAW, more CMs and AESA radar I doubt it would be at same BR as 29SMT and malaysian 29.

Seeing as it is AESA, what would be the horizontal gimball limit?

Looks like ± 60 degrees from description

1 Like

I could see 13.7 with R-77, 14.0 with 77-1s if thats the case.

Here’s some extra info about the radar

Oh i noticed that pic in the main post i just didnt notice its been translated lol.

Is there a picture with the nose cone off showing the AESA?

There is I just forgot to add it when I was writing this post