Couldn’t get anyone to go up that alt.
I had to keep diving from 6km to 1.5km to try and get a kill, and climb back up.
If there was a bomber I would go for that instead.
Mig-23M i assume
becasue the 23ML is already 11.3 in sim
Mig-25. The 23M and MF are fine at 11.0, and the ML should remain at 11.7 (and go to 11.7 in air sim).
1 Like
Rain down missiles with IRST
not that easy in sim
1 Like
It’s KDr is higher in RB because you have 3rd person view and can see when missiles are coming at you.
Not a luxury you have in sim.
Further proving it shouldn’t probably be a 11.0
At the very least the need to pull the sun visor back more.
no it is equal to, if not better than the Mig-23M
in no way should it sit at a lower br than it
4 Likes
Fair, maybe he should cruise right below contrail altitude at 9km and then dip a bit for missile shots
Can get in a better altitude for the jet while not being painfully visible
You only get 2 R-40TDs
And 4 R-60s.
Problem is the R-60s will run out of energy, and more often than not, you won’t see the tiny specs as you fly upside down at 8-10km
It’s not better than a MiG-23 no way you actually can say such a thing.
An aspect may be better, but it doesn’t mean it’s better.
so far i think the only thing we can all agree on is that the major issue is compression and that the foxbat doesnt fit WT gameplay, that being the reason gaijin didnt add it for such a long time.
I mean… they added the pancake which is goated btw
Generally they need to fix the gameplay anyways.
But yes 100% compression doesn’t help.
better missiles
more countermeasures
equal avionics for WT
the only thing that the Mig-25 does worse than the Mig-23M is its flight model at low altitude
More?
Uh what?
Dude you are being super biased now.
64 Countermeasures are more than the 12 that the Mig-23M has
that is pretty simple math and not bias
one of the best events done, that AOA pull is great, and its a wonderful large target.
i dont know what they can do to make people fly higher tbh. the ground is a natural cover with not many downsides in air battles.
I’m 99% sure you said “more missiles” and then changed it
iam 100% sure that you are coping
but yes the Mig-25 can carry more of its long range missiles than the Mig-23M
2 Likes
this is a cope thread. foxbat sucks to play, which is a fair critique.
However nobody can deal with you unless youve done something suicidal. which is pretty strong evendence of a vehicle too low to be fair.
2 Likes
the issue for sim is that you need to put yourself in such situations to find ppl
that is not the case for arb since just get markers for enemies and 3rd person
sure you can fly high and fast in the Mig-25 but then you wont get any kills
and that is why i think, that with how the current brs are, that the Mig-25 is fine at 11.0
the radar is a 1:1 copy of the one in the Mig-23M (with more range)
and locating an enemy in the Mig-25 is harder than in the Mig-23M, since the 25 only has a static redicle and the Mig-23 gets a proper HUD