there is no F-4E nor F-4J that has the 9L at the BR
5 Likes
I may have recorded? Maybe. I’ll have to check later when I’m home.
So this also means that the F15A and E are bad aswell right? So is the shornet and all SEPbrams, since im negative in them which makes them bad, its not a good metric to use.
1 Like
Holy what aboutism.
- You don’t even play simulator.
- Depends on the players whom play said vehicles, when the played them, and the average
For example:
(Had to take a photo on PC, since phone wasn’t working)
It’s in #61 for k/dr
It’s average is a 0.79 which is bad given it is a Fighter / interceptor.
Those negative k/drs are common in bomber / multirole that just bomb and die.
Not a fighter / interceptor.
How does the MiG-25 die in sim if everyone is hugging the deck as you previously said?
1 Like
Because you can see a black dot 2-8 km above you easily.
And if you get an IR lock, they won’t see it, and it will easily travel to them because the MiG-25 is very hot.
Or radar missiles, which there are some good ones to counter the mig.
But the migs strengths take really high alt. Problem is radar missiles are also really effective there.
Pair it all with terrible visibility, and yeah. It’s a wonder it preforms like it does.
Only the Russian long range IR missiles such as the R-27T/ETs can successfully hit a mig-25 from low altitude.
3 Likes
its not a fighter / interceptor its an interceptor simple as that
0.85kd, is the Mirage a bad plane too and should see a br reduction ?
4 Likes
comparing it to a premium aircraft isnt really the fairest comparison
but i dont think that the Mig-25 should go down in br
1 Like
MiG-25 is an event aircraft, so it kind of is fair.
thats the game differences , 5000 battles in the premium 500 in that, the same goes to the Mig that has 1500 battles on it so its natural to has a worse kd
not really since there isnt a direct equivalent to it like with the Mirage F1
where you have 2 identical planes
and most ppl playing the Mig-25 arent doing so for grinding the tech tree or bombing (well since you cant bomb in it)
but i think the BR of the Mig-25 is fine it is roughly equal in capabilities to the Mig-23M (in some aspects even better capabilites) at the same BR and it is just a plane that isnt suited for the gameplay in WT
I killed a MiG that was at 7.5km height, with an Aim-9L.
I was about 2.5~ km up when I fired.
He was traveling towards in, it was traveling towards him.
Pretty easy.
Your looking at a monthly chart, not global aren’t you?
Well, the way I see it:
- either change its br
Or
- allow it to carry 4 R40TDs, and use its radar above 1.5km in MTI mode. If it was at least 3.5KM it would be a lot better. (However this may not be historically accurate, hence why a br change is better)
what does it matter what happened 7 months ago? what maters in br is how preforms the last month.
Why you thing it needs a change? Its a mediocre plane in the current setting , and there is nothing wrong about that
Having it become 10.7 won’t drastically change its performance, but will give it a boost.
Also, Global stats matter most as they measure the best and worst for it.
and put a no fly zone for 9.7 aircraft? its fine were it is just don’t bring it against 12.0
how?? a vehicles might have gotten a recent buff or nerf, monthly ones shows what is happening now, not in the course of years
1 Like
Overall performance > temporary performance.
I could get 16 kills in an F-18 and temporarily make its performance jump. Would you then nerf it?
Or let’s say you leave it as is, then the next week it’s severely negative.
What have you learned? Nothing. From the graph it would show it having both really good and bad performance.
Globally, it shows the overall performance, which shows it at its best and worst.
9.7s would still be able to fly. Don’t be dramatic.
the Mig-25 cant do that
1 Like