Holy crap, did you wipe the whole enemy team in an AH-64E?
show video evidence
The radical people of the forums… it is quite literally insane. The double standards
1 Like
Uhm what exactly does any of that have to do with the discussion we were having?
Trying to respond to the low sp of it, the buk isnt effective if anyone can simply hit the notch/mp etc, so large its actually makes it hard hiding it anywhere on the map. You would rather just play a tank, gain some sp and go cas mode than actually trying to sit defend airspace.
Then why do things like:
The Kv-220 not loader faster than 7.4 secs despite having 2 loaders ?
MZ autoloaders being slower than irl, meanwhile nato vehicles load faster than irl?
Don’t go don’t that rabbit hole. Russia doesn’t get preferred treatment
Yeah ive seen germany more paired with ru(as i main ru) and seen japan or italy against ru, and somehow these stats are very confusing personally to understand. Unless its just 12.7 stuff without the jet cas. But definitely can’t avoid heli cas.
Reload speeds are always a balancing factor, there has never been realistic reloads speeds in this game for any tank. Kv-220 gets a 7.4 sec reload because it is a heavy tank with insane armor.
I wish my TAM and R400 would get their historical 6.7 second reload tho, but alas, Gaijin thinks that 8.4 seconds for a 105 mm is “fair” lol. I’m not paying 2000GE for ace crew, hell nawh.
If you are talking about the leak, then that was never officially announced by Gaijin. Probably something they dabbled with or considered but probably will leave untouched, as I said, reload speeds are a balancing thing.
No, I was talking about reality, and given the state of the T-80Us… it’s grim.
After getting this tank, I thought it was good, turns out I just had good luck, it’s actually really crap. 90% of your matches are 6.7, where your cannon does nothing and you have no mobility to do anything. The Black prince is a far better vehicle while lacking speed.
“Insane armor” uh huh. Maybe 4 years ago.
1 Like
Yeah, because last time I played against the Kv-220 was like 3 years ago, a nightmare to fight. Anyway, not LMUR.
Anyway, Russian bias isn’t real, it can’t hurt you.
1 Like
Aha, sure thing. Don’t ping for unrelated topics then 🤷♂️
Yeah man, it’s crazy how much damage you can do when a nation with the best SACLOS spaa in on your team and the only spaa on the enemy being IR slingers and an afk stormer. Mind blowing, am I right?
Oh yeah, I love the Adats.
proof of original poster
1 Like
Do you even have the vehicle?
1 Like
Well, it’s impossible to stop people from lying on a forum.
2 Likes
I remember how he defended the Kh-38 and claimed it was equal to the Maverick, even though he had 0 battles on the Kh-38 carrier aircraft.
4 Likes
Yeah every SPAA is 70sp, the buk is not special here despite being mid. But still that was not the point of the discussion. The point was that the MI28NM is popular enough to impact russian winrates and trying to blame the massive winrate increase on meta chasers instead of the MI28NM is nonsensical
Fair enough, was there any identification on why during the summer, russian winrates had fallen to 42%. I believe SLM was introduced at the time but started rising after it? It was still before the lmur introduction, looking thru thunderskill or statshark prior.
Russian winrates were stable and rising from march to may and dropped in june when the new SPAA got released. Then they stayed low up until september when the LMUR got added.
1 Like