Well yes, obviously decompressing 9.3 involves causing 14.7+ to exist. That is the implication by supporting decompression.
It’s the entire reason I’ve opposed the movement of compression to the 7 range.
Like, M326 will be OP even at 7.3, and R2Y2 would be as potent at 7.3 as well, which is something I know from having used it when it was 7.3 while I had a skill issue being a fighter.
Granted, if the compression that 9.3 is causing for 8.0 is moved to 7.3, then it’s just a lot more headaches.
I love the 7 range, and I am always holding back stress at how many issues 9.3’s compression causes it.
I understand your own stress, because I feel it when I get in my R2Y2 and I see LIM5Ps knowing they’re going to rip me the first moment they can.
It’s also why I won’t spade the Vampires, cause I feel like they’re less fun R2Y2s. I can’t even destroy ground targets as easily with Vampires like I can R2Y2s.
The R2Y2 of yesteryear was like a myth. Bomber respawn point with 900m/s muzzle velocity, and that’s why it will move from 7.0 -8.0. For R2Y2, I pretty appreciate Simgal’s comment: a better ME262.
For MB326K, actually, as I said before, it is a better R2Y2, whatever for GRB/ARB, but pretty painful when there are a lot of F84G, and of course, people are always making mistakes when they try to dogfight or head on with R2Y2/MB326K, we have see this when people using P51/P47 do the same thing.
I never concern using R2Y2 to against 8,3 or high BR jets, that’s useless, I will quit and choose the other one, most of R2Y2 players will do the same, which makes R2Y2 stats data keep pretty well. For Vampires, R2Y2, the only playable BR is when they are in full downtier, which is also hard due to there are lots of pretty good jets at low BR. If it is not necessary, I will choose F80 or Meteor instead of R2Y2s,
The only which for R2Y2 moves to 7,3 is for GRB, Gaijin just adds a F84G, but that is too bad for CAP, which is even worse than Kikka
literally jumping at shadows and you’re coping if you think Italy should keep this jet at 262 br lmao, overtired Italian planes are the c202ec, g55 series 1, re2005, and g56. this problem is not unique and happens because Italy has a small experienced player base.
All of them. Either they all stay, or they all go. Why should one nation get to keep it’s paper vehicles and another not? And the R2Y2 V1, while never assembled, had every component that was required to build it at least prototyped before the R2Y prototype was destroyed and the project abandoned. There really wasn’t any reason to remove that one from the TT at all, especially now the naval bomber line ends a BR 3.7
This isn’t about nation v.s nation. This is about what should and shouldn’t be removed.
The KT 105, Panther 2, and Coelian broke Gajin’s implementation rules intentionally cause they’re meant to be unique.
R2Y2 and ho-ri broke Gajin’s implementation rules cause Gajin was lazy in researching them.
Gajin knew the famous fake trio were fake when they added em, they didn’t know the ho-ri and R2Y2 were fake. That’s why they should be removed.
C.202EC is NOT overtired. Honestly, it’s flat out OP in GRB.
Brother this entire thread has been about arb since the start.
C.202EC is literally just the 3.0 C.202 swapping out the 7.7mms for 2 mg151s. Other than the added weight of the cannons, there is absolutely zero difference between them *statistically.
Does this really deserve an entire 1BR up? I could see 3.7 maybe, and even some would think that is rather high, since the base C.202 is just kinda OK at 3.0 and swamped by low damage output. This plane is very much overtiered
literally a nonsensical statement the la5fn or even p51 can be used in ground rb for better results. not even going to mention how silly it is to mention it’s performance in ground rb.
I haven’t tried the La-5 cause the Yak-9K overshadows it, and the P-51s are all vastly inferior to the C.202EC for CAS. The best P-51, which is the P-51/Mustang Mk.Ia are still inferior due to low ammo count and being heavier. The extra pen on the Hispanos is nice, but it simply doesn’t outweigh the downsides.
We got footage from CC’s who proved she performs fine. She is slower than what she is currently fighting, but she still outperforms them, just not in the straight-speed department.
She’s also nasty in a good sense to fight in GRBs, too.
Though I am noticing the lesser common sense players are coming out of the mouse hole. Who’s for years got a rep for making some very obtuse claims that destroy their previous stance within a matter of mere seconds.
I have long felt the R2Y2s all belong at the likes of 6.7, 7.0, and 7.3, respectively for the V1, V2, and V3.
We know the things are fake, but the most-similar plane to them - the Me-262A-1a/Jabo - is 7.0. The Sturmvogel event fighter without attacker airspawn is 6.7.
R2Y2s have somewhat better maneuverability, while they have speed, but to my understanding they lose that speed and cannot practically regain it in a useful amount of time, exactly like the 262 family. I will be starting to spade all three soon enough once I finish spading out all my 262s.
MC205/205 get a pretty good FM buff, I still remember when they came out; their FM is horrible, but did Gaijin also buff their low-speed performance? I don’t think it is better than 109F4
Mustang Mk.ia and C.202EC are goated CAS. If it ain’t got autocannons it just ain’t worth it. .50cals are so incredibly bad at strafing, I had no idea what I was missing whilst playing America, and I have no idea how people bear using .50cals.
My reply is about the C.202 which is worse because it doesn’t have the DB605 like the C.205s do but yeah the C.205 S1 is pretty good at 3.7, it’s comparable to 109f4 just with worse armament, slightly worse climb traded for better turn, it could be better or worse mostly just depending how one likes to play
C.205 S3 is just the same thing but with more guns (heavier) and 4.7 for some god unknown reason
you act like you have stand out stats lol 12.7s have better penetration and are definitely better for staffing as you can engage at longer ranges, please stop trolling