Yes but we need ones exclusive to britain that no one else can get so that they stay unique while bolstering the lineups.
well the 102 probably wont come as its just a transport but the 107 might they would need to make a new model for it tho
… the FV102 Striker is an ATGM carrier, yk the same as the one in the UK tree?! Striker | War Thunder Wiki
Alvis/BAE made enough Unique CVRTs to fill like 2 lineups of just CVRTs.
I want them all
2 Likes
oh oops i got it confused with the spartan transport (not used to going off of only the numbers)
You said Alvis and my mind got hit with PTSD from arguing with him over the dumbest things which make me regret looking at the forum in the first place.
7 Likes
When it comes to better missiles for other helis, is this a viable suggestion?
sometimes i wonder if we have to start including mf braille in bug reports
More likely need to adding in bribes just to get them noticed.
1 Like
I think Gaijin really did this to themselves by working on it. They could’ve easily not made the Thai VT-4 and just not mentioned it and it would just join the many vehicles not yet in game.
But now that it’s been worked on and even mentioned by Gaijin they have to either upset Chinese players, or unfairly restrict Thai vehicle additions.
4 Likes
truly one of the forum members of all time. I just ignore them at this point
imho I think gaijin should go full ahead with the Thai VT-4, they haven’t cared while adding the Bison, they’ve not cared while adding the same amount of Belgium F-16 as the US ones. So why suddenly care about the Thai-Chinese vehicles.
6 Likes
i think i missed the part where some people being a bih decide what vehicles could and couldnt come
imagine making a tank for export and then bursting into tears when the tank gets exported
3 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT Need clarification on this bug report. Every other toptier jet has a 1.05x multiplier on the VNE limits. Why can’t the F-14 be treated fairly?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jz750xrun9ir
That’s not the same thing. I’m bug reporting the lack of the 1.05x multiplier now. Thats saying stuff about it’s speed. They incorrectly read the graph and interpreted a clean F-14 as an F-14 with 4 Aim-7s and 50% fuel, severely underestimating it’s abilities. Because of this, my new report needs to be reopened, fixed independently, and applied to the rest of regimes of the F-14’s flight. “That material has already been considered in the past.” is not an adequate response when the material has been misrepresented.
The report was concerning speed and the VNE. The VNE is correctly configured in game already and all the material in the new report has already been previously reviewed by the developers.
ZTQ15 should be tech tree, not squadron.
@AydanL44100
None of those vehicles are copy-paste.
@quartas121
IS-2, TTS, Chi-Ha, etc would have to be removed for fairness.
That would also mean no M1A2 for China.
3 Likes
But these tanks were captured so to them it’s fair game to have them which I don’t understand because these are the ones that they are moaning about
clearly its okay for China to have Japanese tanks but not the other way around lol
not to mention if we wanna be fair where is our british panthers and jagdpanthers or our countless bf-109s and Fw190s
11 Likes
And they are also perfectly fine with asking for export tanks from other nations, but as soon as another nation gets an export tank from them it’s suddenly a problem.
11 Likes