Major Update "Seek & Destroy" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 5)

[warthogboy09]

@Ziggy1989

It’s not an operational command post to coordinate strategic operations. It’s an attack helicopter.

More and more platforms are beginning to act as datahuns though

[_BabyRaptor]

found it
but not the forum

[Ziggy1989]

@_BabyRaptor_

Work at cisco? is they help with military thing too? if that, you will already know that it’s not enough.

I did not quite understand you. Cisco has contract with the US armed forces in telecommunications applications. In particular I worked in Voice Over IP in the private sector.

[Ziggy1989]

Elta makes radars btw & warning receivers.

[_BabyRaptor]

so what? it said a SATCOM not radar

also Elta is upgrade the Israel’s ah-64 too

that

is for MAW

[Ziggy1989]

@_BabyRaptor_

so what? it said a SATCOM not radar

What I am saying that book is not a primary source. It is a secondary source. They can be wrong.

I am looking up the exact model type. It still makes zero technological sense there is two of them on each pylon wing.

Unless you wrote the book there is no need to be offended that I have a high personal standard for fact & burden of proof.

Its literally a paragraph a page picture book. Do you understand this? I appreciate the point in the right direction as well.

[_BabyRaptor]

the book

the name of the satcom from “ELTA”

ELTA-ELK-1891 SATCOM

as i said one for reviver and one is transmitter

[_BabyRaptor]

@Ziggy1989

I am looking up the exact model type. It still makes zero technological sense there is two of them on each pylon wing.

Unless you wrote the book there is no need to be offended that I have a higher personal standard for fact & burden of proof.

Its literally a paragraph a page picture book. Do you understand this? I appreciate the point in the direction as well.

the name is already in that paragraph.

then find it and give me what exactly that half ball is. if the source is not what you like

[Ziggy1989]

Appreciate it.

It is making more sense that it would be used to designate targets for GPS guided munition.

@_BabyRaptor_

the name is already in that paragraph.

then find it and give me what exactly that half ball is. if the source is not what you like

Why are you offended? No need. You are correct.

Its specifically for two-way target designation of GPS guided munitions deployed by the IAF.

Now the question is… Will GJ model this targeting precision with the F-15 & F-16’s GPS guided munitions when they come to the game?

[_BabyRaptor]

i already told you that and you not believing it

@_BabyRaptor_

the model is that big and need two because one is a receiver and one is transmitter.

@Ziggy1989

Why are you offended? No need. You are correct.

why? because it look like you didn’t try to find it yourself. it is all in that sentence but you still not try to search. what i read from the first to now is you are talk in negative way and believe in just one thing. also @Morvran said" it could be anything" in the end but you still said

@Ziggy1989

Why two?

It’s definitely a PD radar imo like @Morvran first suggested. Which will use a high PRF because these frequencies measure velocity & closer rate the best. Missiles fly at you in a very fast closer rate. PD radar can detect IR & radar guided munitions.

It’s a MAW & there are two of them to provide full 360 coverage. How they scan or possibly not at all is the next question & for another topic.

i said give me a prove that it is a MAW but you said

@Ziggy1989

Its definitely not a satcom. The Israelis can design a satcom transmit & receiver in one application & it makes no sense they would be in two different locations.

Additionally what is the Satcom for? Orbital strikes?

is that not going to get me offended when you said this in that section paragraph too?

@Ziggy1989

What I am saying that book is not a primary source. It is a secondary source. They can be wrong.

I am looking up the exact model type. It still makes zero technological sense there is two of them on each pylon wing.

Unless you wrote the book there is no need to be offended that I have a higher personal standard for fact & burden of proof.

Its literally a paragraph a page picture book. Do you understand this? I appreciate the point in the direction as well.

so now you understand why that i’m offended. i leaving now i have to go to work if you have anything i will come back in 8 hours.

[Ziggy1989]

@_BabyRaptor_

i said give me a prove that it is a MAW but you said

I said I am strongly inclined to believe it is a MAW or some sort of terrain following radar.

I did however declare that it is not a telecommunications array. I am sorry.

I did not brush aside when you provided the manufacturer & model type I delved right into searching on the web because secondary sources are not always correct (I am not even sure if that book counts as secondary but may be tertiary as it does not even describe its functionality, just said “satcom” & Elta Systems is primarily known for its radars).

Hope you can understand this perspective & why the book was not immediately accepted as fact.

@Ziggy1989

Its either RWR related, telecommunication related or something else.

I was also always open to the potential it was telcom related fyi.
:)

@_BabyRaptor_

so now you understand why that i’m offended. i leaving now i have to go to work if you have anything i will come back in 8 hours.

Have a great day & hope you enjoy the update! That is all I wish for you when you return.

[quartas121]

Aren’t f-16 joystick known
For having limited range of motion bc of the fbw or something?

[Ziggy1989]

Yes, there is very little play in the flight stick. I have personally messed with it at Edwards AFB.

There is much more free range of motion than a sim/gaming flight stick imo.

[aDSD]

I dont know if thats a thibg but we have seen T-14 and it’s parts being assembled in territory of UVZ.

[gszabi99]

@Semi-Active

Are all vehicles coming in the next update revealed or are we expecting more?

2.37.0.9 (From a quarter of an hour ago) brings no new vehicles. If that’s the release version, (which it likely is,) no new vehicles.

[Miraz05]

bottom left

[Ziggy1989]

My apologies I did not see this. I asked specifically about the R-77 for the Bison & whether the Mig-21-93 would be added this update.

I asked about the product coming & the potential of the other variant. Of course, I did not press smin to about the R-77 today. Because obviously there is no way in hell a premium aircraft is coming to the British tech tree with R-77s this update.
(Even though GJ would make a killing off that premium, which is evident that GJ does actually put profit
maximization aside in the name of game balance & efficiency).

@__Renzo__

Your question was not about the product, the product was the MiG-21 Bison, you were asking questions about an aircraft for an entirely different nation.

I asked about both, good sir.

[SnOwCoNe_III]

Well, Its gonna be coming out soon. Wish you all the best on grinding on the stuff you guys are getting.

[UnHolySausage]

Gszabi u gonna datamine femboy pics of some of the devs yet? 🥺

[Ziggy1989]

Those would classify as data not reportable in Datamine, sir.