the name is already in that paragraph.
then find it and give me what exactly that half ball is. if the source is not what you like
the name is already in that paragraph.
then find it and give me what exactly that half ball is. if the source is not what you like
Appreciate it.
It is making more sense that it would be used to designate targets for GPS guided munition.
Why are you offended? No need. You are correct.
Its specifically for two-way target designation of GPS guided munitions deployed by the IAF.
Now the question is… Will GJ model this targeting precision with the F-15 & F-16’s GPS guided munitions when they come to the game?
i already told you that and you not believing it
why? because it look like you didn’t try to find it yourself. it is all in that sentence but you still not try to search. what i read from the first to now is you are talk in negative way and believe in just one thing. also @Morvran said" it could be anything" in the end but you still said
i said give me a prove that it is a MAW but you said
is that not going to get me offended when you said this in that section paragraph too?
so now you understand why that i’m offended. i leaving now i have to go to work if you have anything i will come back in 8 hours.
I said I am strongly inclined to believe it is a MAW or some sort of terrain following radar.
I did however declare that it is not a telecommunications array. I am sorry.
I did not brush aside when you provided the manufacturer & model type I delved right into searching on the web because secondary sources are not always correct (I am not even sure if that book counts as secondary but may be tertiary as it does not even describe its functionality, just said “satcom” & Elta Systems is primarily known for its radars).
Hope you can understand this perspective & why the book was not immediately accepted as fact.
I was also always open to the potential it was telcom related fyi.
:)
Have a great day & hope you enjoy the update! That is all I wish for you when you return.
Aren’t f-16 joystick known
For having limited range of motion bc of the fbw or something?
Yes, there is very little play in the flight stick. I have personally messed with it at Edwards AFB.
There is much more free range of motion than a sim/gaming flight stick imo.
I dont know if thats a thibg but we have seen T-14 and it’s parts being assembled in territory of UVZ.
2.37.0.9 (From a quarter of an hour ago) brings no new vehicles. If that’s the release version, (which it likely is,) no new vehicles.
bottom left
My apologies I did not see this. I asked specifically about the R-77 for the Bison & whether the Mig-21-93 would be added this update.
I asked about the product coming & the potential of the other variant. Of course, I did not press smin to about the R-77 today. Because obviously there is no way in hell a premium aircraft is coming to the British tech tree with R-77s this update.
(Even though GJ would make a killing off that premium, which is evident that GJ does actually put profit
maximization aside in the name of game balance & efficiency).
I asked about both, good sir.
Well, Its gonna be coming out soon. Wish you all the best on grinding on the stuff you guys are getting.
Gszabi u gonna datamine femboy pics of some of the devs yet? 🥺
Those would classify as data not reportable in Datamine, sir.
What’s the purpose anymore
Lets see what people think about Deathmisser.(No offence btw)
Yes, no, mayhaps, and all three at once.
least ambiguous poll results
@SPANISH_AVENGER from the datamine discord the f4f ice at the very least comes with Aim-9Li stock (IIRCCM missles) and only has to research the smokeless version
Trolle fun tho.
This playerbase tends to come out with the juiciest reactions so I bet it can be entertaining as hell
Holy shit that’s amazing.