Major Update "Seek & Destroy" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 5)

Which is unfortunate but I suppose I wont complain

And if Japan cant get SK at least give us ASEAN

1 Like

??? I’m not getting picky? I’m just stating I’d rather not see another stunted disastertree like Israel.

in some cases its justified, british mains being pissed we get copy paste eastern slop from india, which even then will literally be like SA and will never go past 10.3 in ground, since the T90S is their best tank

1 Like

I remember when the Hungarian air sub tree was shown off in the teaser, I thought the Yak 9 was Yugoslav due to the roundel and I nearly had a heart attack thinking Yugoslavia would go to Italy.

3 Likes

India has a T90M equivalent and even a superior variant technically

and later UK can get russian and french aircraft LOL

(mirage 2000 with R73) hehehe

1 Like

Cant wait to grind the Rafale and Su-30MKI in the same tree :D

2 Likes

I believe it was directed more towards me.

do they? the best I could find was the T90S

Man needs to adjust his replies off of scattergun mode then.

They do it even has its own native produced ammo and internals I believe

oh boy, surely it will be good (clueless)

1 Like

Really hoping for north Korea one day.
I need myself a Chonma ho

5 Likes

The T-90SM and T-90 MK.3/ Bhishma MK.3

I also think the indian choice is questionable, although I also partially don’t like the other options that much. I’m very much against just unncessicarily porting other nation’s vehicles to different nations just because.

Which is why I was and still am against tanks like the M1A1 AIM going to britain.

I really like the idea of the upgraded jordanian CR1s. Could make for decent 10.7-11.0 vehicles in either the SA or vickers line.

I hope not 10.7 or 11.0 as they would DOA since we dont have a single tank at those BRs

also if we must have copy paste slop I would still far rather have a nation close to the UK and one that still actually fucking uses western tech not the sorry excuse india will be in the british tree

1 Like

They’d easily be 11.0 or higher to my knowledge

If tanks added to a BR gap are DOA, why do Japan mains want tanks to fill the gaps if they would almost all be DOA?

KE-W with a crewless turret is pretty easily 11.0 material, since the Merkava Mk.3s are also 11.0.

difference is, japan with the right sub tree would get a meaningful amount of additions at those BRs a single Jordanian challenger 1 would have no place in any line up, no point up BRing the other challenger 1s and cant bring it at 11.3 or 11.7 as we have literally 7 or 8 other challenger 2s all that would be better then it

1 Like