thats my guess, kind of artillery strike you but you lock with your own spaa and lead the missle into the target so to say
( https://www.artstation.com/artwork/nYx4DK )
( War-Thunder-Datamine/aces.vromfs.bin_u/gamedata/weapons/rocketguns/s75m_missile_v760.blkx at master · gszabi99/War-Thunder-Datamine · GitHub )
3 Likes
Eh you gotta differentiate hungary and finland. Finland got like 4 unique vehicles mainly air total i think, and hungary got four unique ground vehicles with no air. See i think gaijin looked at the feedback on finland when adding hungary ground then when the air tree came about they just decided to go the EZ way because they didnt really give a shit. I personally believe gaijin planned for the Turan 2 and 3 along with the Zrinyi 2 to be event/premium until they saw the feedback from finland. Literally finland air is all premiums lmao. I really expect gaijin to add most hungarian props to be premium instead of TT
Probably that
1 Like
7 Likes
Dmitri just want to play his favorite tech
7 Likes
Seems legit
from those 3 the only one affected is the leclerc, as the fuel tanks on the front of the abrams and merkava does not do damage when they detonate… the most affected are by far the ones that have unprotected fuel tanks in the front, aka all leclerc, type 10, all russian and chinese tanks
1 Like
New surface to air missile complexes:
MIM-23 Hawk
S-75M
MIM-104 Patriot
S-300PS
New MLRS’
New tactical ballistic missile launchers
New cruise missile launcher
M983 HEMTT
The only thing that seems to still be missing from Oliviia 's leaklist is the X/Kh-55.
8 Likes
swedish strv122 tech implemented into light tanks
f4f and ahrriers aren named, can we shot as many as we want?
The Leclerc “SHOULD” have about ~700mm of KE protection in the front, with the drivers port being the only weak point.
Then the fuel tank “SHOULD” be giving extra survivability for the lower plate, but Gaijin thinks an exposed fuel tank to the crew compartment is normal. There’s still no titanium modelled last I checked either.
The Type 10 has nano crystal steel to reduce it’s weight, but Gaining modelled it as if it’s just normal steel and gave it armor protection from there.
It’s mostly just Gaijin being extremely slow and lazy with researching and modeling, with asking for documents being used as an excuse to keep putting it off. Because they can’t model weight correctly to save their lives and assume it’s all just dead weight.
7 Likes
No idea. Might be radar related. See oshidas latest datamine i think it mentions a lot of radars with the max target thing. Not sure.
And you can fire as many missiles as you have, can only give course correction from the mother ship to the last number of missiles.
Since we already recieved confirmation from Smin that BOZ dispesers on the tornados will be modelled correctly (1000+ chaff total) with the addition of seperate flare/chaff keybinds;
Will we expect to see similar buffs/nerfs to other dispesners that were previously incorrectly modelled like that?
Examples:
- Mirage 2000 family recieving a few hundred more Chaff due to the “Spirale” dispenser
- Mirage 4000 recieving a similar buff due to the electromechanical chaff dispenser in its countermeasure pods
- ALE-40 (F-4E/K/M, F-5A/C, Jaguar GR.1, F-104s, etc.) recieving a flare/chaff load balance nerf (the flare cartridges were considerably bigger; it should have a 1/4 flare/chaff balance; i.e on the F-4E, it can have 30 flares in a “all flares” loadout, or 120 chaff in a “all chaff” loadout)
- LAU-138 (F-14B) becoming chaff only, with a total loadout of 640 chaff and 60 flares (BOL-IR was not used on Tomcats until the F-14D)
Explanation of Spirale dispensers on the Mirage 2000 from MBDA’s website:
16 Likes
A big argument against the addition of the Python 4 was that it was a long range maneuverable IR missile that didn’t have to deal with multipath.
But now that there’s a significant reduction of multipath across the board, should there be a revisit to the addition of Python 4?
3 Likes
Hopefully if the Python 4 gets added they properly do the AAM-3
1 Like