Major Update "Seek & Destroy" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 4)

[Shin_Kazama]

I could see Spanish/Portuguese TT at some point.

I was mostly thinking though that Spain would be the big Italy sub nation/sub tree, with Romania and Hungary just adding a couple interesting or “needed” vehicles here and there

[Morvran]

Yeah, I would agree, but after Hungary sub-TT probably not now

[Shay]

For indigenous vehicles, Italy. For modifications, wherever the original vehicle comes from.

[PilotPug010]

@warthogboy09

Multipathing heights are being tied to individual missiles data. They are all still set at 100 for now, but hopefully changes in the future.

Well this would be a great way to introduce (significantly) lower multipathing heights.

If multipathing is already unrealistically high (and systematic) for gameplay purposes then leave them high for ARH and lower for SARH or something.

Anyone have a good read on multipathing and if it really is like in War Thunder (that high and that systematic)

[warthogboy09]

Reduce Multipathing for Active Radar Homing (Fox 3) Missiles in Air-Simulator Game Mode

In case people want to do some reading. Yes, Multipathing is a real phenomenon. However, it’s effects are far too overstated in game. And we have documentation showing current SARHs are resistant at different to various degrees, but all are well below 100m. There is also the excellent source found by @Defbond showing how even if an inverse monopulse missile is affected by multipathing, the likelihood of it being decoyed like it is in game is just fantasy. I’ll do a more comprehensive p…

This has most of the compiled information on the subject

[Hyrikul]

Sound like a way better launch than Bluewater, if that’s the case

[quartas121]

Whatever aircraft goes to the country of origin I guess. No way to know if Spanish aircraft will even be added

[_Renzo]

@Morvran

M1A1 AIM would have made a more interesting SQV for Britain than T-90 did

Britain shouldn’t get an Abrams, it’s just that simple.

This is why people are so annoyed with british mains. They have pretty much requested/whined to get multiple top tier vehicles from multiple different vehicles.

2A4M, 2A6M, M1A1 AIM, hell even the Centauro RGO and I’m sure the australian SEPv3 is on the menu for whining in the future.

Britain shouldn’t just get every vehicle from every tree.

[Kminek246]

Especially if the Trizzter guy will see it…or what evet that guy name is…he shouldnt be working as a bug report moderator

[Kminek246]

From playing them for last few day i found few things.

For some reason the 40mm APFSDS has a huge problems with taking out gun barrels. I can fire like 7-10 shots streight on into the gun and if im lucky i will turn it dark yellow. Plus sometimes it feels like some of my shells dont even register when they hit a target

And second is the HE-VT suuuuck. The ammount of times i saw the HE-VT explode near air targer (being it helis, jets, drones) and not even give me a hit. Only time i kill them it feels that my proxy didnt explode near them, just hit them directly. But i hope that that will be fixed with Gaijin working on AHEAD and proxy shell, hopefully fixing them

[高坂桐乃海军上将]

I always want to know why there are 2 month between 2 major updats when gaijin only do half of the work of the next major update ,but they can finish the other half within the 2 weeks between the open of the dev server and the final update’s coming.

[Firestarter]

@Morvran

with the exception of the F-111C I can see being controversial, but I dont see the harm as an event aircraft at some point in the future

I’d contest that. After all, we were going to get our own version of the F-111. We could get that, or we could get an Australian 111C. Not that it should matter a whole lot.
America still has plenty of variants of the F-111 to add

[luque13]

And the Germans don’t, pot, kettle black

[Firestarter]

Dunno if you need help reading there, but Morv literally said he doesn’t want all the US Exports to Australia coming to Britain etc etc

@Morvran

But I dont think defacto all US export vehicles to Australia should go to the US.

Personally I’m against getting stuff that’s very obviously not related to that country (so Britain shouldn’t get a Australian Abrams, likewise Germany shouldn’t get the Chally 130. I still hate whoever’s idea it was to go “noooo you can’t have EAP but you can have the South African Gripen”)

I’d much prefer it if Gaijin just buffed the Challengers and stopped smoking whatever it is that leads them to believe the mantlet is completely unprotected and that their damage model magically equates about 500mm KE protection to 260mm KE, and of course our favourite, the Backing Plate that’s made of Aluminium.

[dotSHINI]

different situation, we are looking only for 1 vehicle to solve the f4f ice —> typhoon gap
Just like britain received the gripen as well.
In the meantime british where looking for multiple vehicles from a lot of countries while already having 2 sub nations

[dotSHINI]

@Firestarter__

not related to that country

@Firestarter__

likewise Germany shouldn’t get the Chally 130

Just saying, if you like it or not. The Challenger 130 is related to germany.
Do i think germany needs it or should it go to germany? No
But it is related to germany

[Deathmisser]

@_Renzo

This is why people are so annoyed with british mains. They have pretty much requested/whined to get multiple top tier vehicles from multiple different vehicles

Bruh you know the German mains are worse we can link threads to you as prove @Morvran care to link them m8 ?

[dotSHINI]

argentinia, poland, denmark and neitherlands dont count anymore. They have been officialy been denied. Naturaly we continued looking for solutions elsewhere for the air problem.
On the other hand UK asked for further nations vehicles which dont even solve specific problems while already having 2 sub nations.

[Shay]

Argentina has been confirmed to be a sub nation of Germany, but okay.

[dotSHINI]

you missed the last few days it seems