Major Update "Ninth Wave" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

Underperforming, it’s very nice for missile, they put a common seeker with only IRCCM, and even so, many people die. Imagine it being launched from an aircraft at Mach 1.7, like the enemy’s 6. :)

I know but its hard to compare like that cause Sufa feels much heavier ingame

FIM-92K doesnt have any real IRCCM (works good on helis though) and aim-9m can be worse than 9L at times sadly.

on the stream atleast, the new f16c had the same engine name as the f15e engine

Is that the standard for the “x-ray” view? Does Gaijin share the formula used to calculate such detection range? It should be completely different for mscan and ESA radars.

The dev server is open now

Dev server is up, at least I’ve managed to log in.

Yeah, for the x-ray view range it is for aerial target of three square meters for RCS.
As for the other factors, I haven’t investigated it myself.

DEV SERVER is OPEN

Can someone see if Type 10s can now turn properly, please?

Maybe they’ve fixed the steering after 5 years…

I also don’t suppose the Merkavas have got their chains, right? xD

Any signs of regenerative steering?

1 Like

The data displayed on the exhibition boards of various countries are measured using different standards, and the data from many radars is currently under confidentiality. Therefore, the performance of modern radars in the game largely depends on the subjective initiative of gaijin.

j10 is already bad at high alt + very low amounts of fuel capacity so sad

Derby er for spyder i love u gaijin

3 Likes

This is indeed a very fatal point.

1 Like

ye and i heard that it will drink more fuel as well?


open

2 Likes

ok thanks

image
im GONNA CRY OH MYGODDD

12 Likes

@Smin1080p_WT Why are the devs removing AIM-120A/B from planes like the golden eagle when they are better in most situations then AIM-120-C-5 and AIM-120D

There is no need to remove these missiles from these aircraft and in turn it nerfs these aircraft which is the opposite of what is needed

Like AIM-120D was meant to improve US wins rates but it is just a mildy more range AIM-120-C-5 which isn’t a great missile

Removing AIM-120-A for the AIM-120-D is a net negative for US top tier

5 Likes