suppose to open today but don’t know when exactly
2 Likes
imagine if nato IRCCM missiles worked let alone amraam. current balancing would be an absolute moment lol
the amount of times my IRCCM missile on my stormer AD gets one flared by a jet on full afterburner is insane
1 Like
nice gif
11:59 pm
magic works just fine
He’s talking about the seeker shutoff type instead of the FOV shrink
Range doubled from 70 to 120 km means it just has a slightly bigger battery surely… PL-15 is also PL-12 with new fin we believe dual pulse marketing lie no such technology developed
2 Likes
Does anyone have a grath comparing the engines on a new and old F-16C? I’m talking about something similar to what been posted about the new J-10C engine
it was announcement by smin or something ? I didn’t saw any time announcement
Well no I believe
Now imagine the American mains saying they need Aim-9x, imagine the fear of developers about IIR missile.
1 Like
This sounds very much like something gaijin’s issue manager will say.
Well it’s already on the NASAMS and already underperforming so imagine what missiles MICA and Python 5 are going to be like let alone good weapons like ASRAAM
I didn’t change the altitude, so this is engine performance at 100m. At altitudes like 4000-8000 the gap gets even bigger.
1 Like
Just look at Sufa engine, it should be the same.
oh yeah those are broken
How does Gaijin determine the range of radars as displayed in “X-ray” view? In the dev stream the AN/APG-83 on the block 52 has a range of 160km, some sources claim up to 370km.
I don’t understand why they haven’t released modern IR msls like AIM9X, PL10, or R74M yet. I think the time is ripe.
3 Likes
160km is for an target the size of 3 square meters.