It applies to too many nations already, we shouldnt keep recreating it
also it is mlu 1 time period off the top of my head when they got it
I swear if Russia gets antiship missiles but the F/A-18 doesn’t
So just screw Sweden and Finland then? Is that your great solution to fix everything wrong with the game.
They add MLU 1 and the Finish Hornet is identical to the US one for air, and just as, if not more historically accurate.
What is the issue with that?
Where did i say that
we could just have a worse one at a lower br until the time where its added properly which might be the next update
we already have the gripen, and even tho its state is poor, its still very capable
F-15E is suffering /s
But what would you have placed at 2nd and 3rd then?
Israel may be getting Spice 1000 along with 2000, and 250!
They all should get a very long IR track/lock range when implemented.
But no python 4
They show absolutely no signs of lowering its BR
So, either they add the MLU 1 at least, or Sweden get shafted for no reason
Again, there is no reason to not add the MLU 1 given that it would be IDENTICAL to the US F/A-18C except for the A2G weapons
Gaijin’s whole reason for not adding the MLU 2 was then new cockpit it received, but the MLU 1 has the same cockpit that is already modeled in the US one, so there are no developmental issues, and no logical issues with adding the MLU 1, at this point one can only assume it’s out of spite that they haven’t
@Smin1080p_WT i hate having to ping but i would appreciate an answer as to why we don’t get the same treatment as the US. Is having HMD also just too much to ask?
everything is subject to change
Like upgrading it to the MLU 1 for example
yeah it could be but people will only complain in the future when it doesnt have its accurate stuff
Hey. I have already answered you on this. The current version is not MLU. This will be a separate version later.
yeah … “sniff”
Su-35 or Su-30SM2 and Gripen E
There are 2 MLU programs, the reasons you gave only apply to the second, MLU 1 is absolutely possible, it’s the same cockpit as the US Hornet and it give the Finnish one HMS and IFF
Why do we have to wait, why does the worse model have to be the same BR as the better version why is there such a stigmatism against Finland theres clearly a large majority that want it. It didn’t stop you guys from removing the Gripen A’s HMD when the C came around. So why should we wait? As stated by you yourself the MLU doesn’t fit the requirements to be added aince it doesn’t offer enough change like the Gripen C did. And knowing gaijin why would i want to play a Hormet with HMD at a higher BR than the one that could’ve gotten HMD?
It would be better with F18 pre mlu at 13.3 and then F/A-18 MLU 2 at 14.0
that way theres an actual difference between the two
The problem is gaijin doesn’t want to do that and Pre MLU didn’t use 9L or Aim 7 irl so it cant exist gaijin is doing this to specifically screw Finland over just like they always do.