is the T.10 going to get a pre-order? or is it going to turn up on the day?
Ussr getting ASM?
As opposed to an F-18 at 14.0 with no HMS or IFF?
quite easily it shouldnt be 14.0, giving fake stuff is not the move
or creating a mix match, thats also a bad move
huh, yeah idk why thats there considering its the anit ship version (with a 285km range) not to mention ARH head for ground targets so if that did come it would be a massive middle finger to the brimstones after them saying they arent adding ARH A2G weapons
good to know, so because the americans installed their countermesure system in the airframe rather then as a pylon modification, they get it…
wonderful game development attitude
It is what it is
the Hunter FGA.9 is actually not bad for its be (and is the best hunter the UK has lol)
Kh-59MK is a Cruise-Missile / very long range ASM.
How good that I just finished my SCALP-EG suggestion.
1 Like
I hate the state of the gripens, its like theres 0 effort and none of its historical
Its not fake? Im essentially asking for it be the MLU, if gaijin doesnt want it to have IFF then thats fine. Sure Sim will be annoying but losing HMD is even worse.
Not like they ever tried in the first place lol
MK is specifically for antishipping
Is it? As i know it should have an ARH seeker
Or you know, just use the MLU 1 version with HMS and IFF
They wouldn’t need to add any assets; it’s just the US one without A2G weapons
IFF is kinda given to all im pretty sure, look at the F4F ice as it shouldnt have it in game but does
adding HMD but none of the weaponry or anything else from MLU 1 literally removes the point of the MLU 1 upgrade
which is why i hate the gripens in game
Too advantageous, do you know what would happen if the Finnish players actually got a good TT addition? The world would end and balance would be no more
2 Likes
The only weapon the MLU 1 should have that it wouldn’t is the AIM-9X, which is true of every US aircraft with JHMCS too
Aim 120C
That was MLU 2 I believe, though that issue would apply to the US