The air to ground is the same 4x AGM-65Gs.
Either way it should be 11.7 for ground, and whatever Sea Harrier is for air.
I’m adding T.10 to my wishlist alongside Type 74.
Coolest premiums of the update so far.
For A2A there is basically no difference. If anything the T10 might be better equipped. For A2G as a premium for GRB CAS, T10 is the better choice. It also looks rather unique. So I dont have an issue with the T10 choice, and it cool to have a Trainer Harrier (they look awesome)
The isuse is they seem to have no grasp of balance
1 Like
Sea Harrier is 11.0, so the T10 at the moment is somehow higher.
GRB, yeah 11.3 or 11.7 it doesnt matter, we only have 11.7 tanks and no 11.3. but given the Tornado Gr1 is probably better overall, and is 11.3…
Though would be nice to get TIALD fixed at some point and like the Gr7 its missing its GPS guided bombs and outer Pylon AGM-65s
1 Like
Same engine as the GR7 unfortunately. So probably correct. But does add to the argument of getting BOL when compared to the AV-8B(NA)
4 Likes
I would have understood adding 4 BOL and removing its MAW for balance (which would rely on MK.1 eyeballs like everyone else
But no BOL? It really sucks since the harrier should be running cold as ice and only need 1 pop for each missile. But we have the worst gen 2 harrier engine and airframe, with the least amount of countermeasures.
I love how the F/A-18 and F16 premium for other nations is a straight upgrade from tech tree stuff at the same BR, but the UK struggles to get a premium that can match a premium in another tech tree
11 Likes
Given the A-10C has 480 CMs and all-aspect MAWS at 11.7 or the IRCM + 192 CMs on the Su-39 at 11.3. I dont think the rear-aspect MAWS on the T-10 is actually even note worthy.
But 60 CMs at the same BR as the AV-8B(NA) with 180, All while the AV-8B(NA) has the better engine and maybe better RWR?
Its frustrating. Sea Harrier FRS1 is a more viable aircraft for ARB at 11.0 currently, especially if it gets EEGS this update
6 Likes
A-10C doesn’t get a MAWS
edit: Wait no it’s just not labelled in game, Wonderful lmao
Nah I think it remained 60, not sure if gaijin is gonna change that
1 Like
I bet you within this year everyone will get a variant of the F-16 and Mig-29 as a premium.
Its so annoying that we even have to discuss this.
This confirms that whoever is balancing these aircraft does NOT play the harriers(or even the game for that fact). The AV8S has more countermeasures then this currently and its a 9.7? Does that mean it needs to move to 12.0
Literally the ONE new aircraft i was really excited for and its getting shafted. Hate being a fan of the UK tree …
Just checked, Late has 120, the other 2 still have 60.
Huh, that’s it IG? That’s really dumb and annoying.
Yeah… 60 CMs might… might be fine. If it was anything other than the Harrier, but you’ll use most of those just defending against a single Aim-9E, let alone the R-73 or Aim-9Ms on similar attack aircraft
1 Like
Yeah, Might make a suggestion for this, but for vehicles you havent gotten access to start researching yet, the stat window and preview should be for its spaded state, not unspaded. It makes comparing to aircraft you dont have unlocked really really hard
3 Likes
Especially since the best way to play the GR.7 is to pre flare anytime someone is looking your way!
1 Like
Yup, you have to.
Ya, it’s led to a few weird BRs on the air tree I made.
Well there are some I had pointed out and dealt with, there is likely even more I missed.
1 Like
Worth a try:
6 Likes