The early aircraft pre-order pack rank 9 for sweden tech tree 2 or 3 years after open rank 9, my guess.
AIM-9X (Block I) (if gaijin ready) and AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM
Personally, BR 14.7
last week gaijin said plan F/A-18C MLU 2 after this major update
I predict that F/A-18C late from dev server mix 2006 ~ Q2 2014
Unlikely, its too compressed to be added and he basically denied it cause its too similar to the US 14.0 hornet for A2A
is it because of LJDAM?
Sweden already got a rank 7 or 8 premium, its would be about 2 more years before we get another and sweden doesn’t have enough aircraft to spare for top tier for premiums or squadron
quite silly on Gaijin part, but ok
If that’s true then that doesn’t make sense since we had a wave of C&P P-51C’s like three iirc.
Though saying that I could see the MLU 1 being premium, even for squad.
Gotta appeal to the nation that brings in money. I assume they dont want a repeat of the 229 problem.
Where would it go? Same BR as the TT model? Additionally he stated adding MLU 1 would take away the uniqueness of aircraft from another tree which is why they chose to add the 1994 model and the US 2006 model.
Could you find me that quote, as that some level of ego for the US right there
would it really -229 level though? that is a very extreme case.
Cant Smin deleted his posts and many of my own from that forum because if you read it. Its basically a sharks pool
Theres a few where you see us reply to him and it leads nowhere. Again he had to delete stuff because it made him/gaijin look bad or led down rabbit holes.
we still deserve unique aircraft. but not like this, no real CAS armament is pretty big difference by itself
Too late monkeys paw effect. The US complained about the F15I and so now gaijin may be looking at essentially holding back everyone else instead of just making them on par. Its just a poor decision all around. Already told people if you want a good Finnish F-18 just go download a skin on the live and play the US models.
Just adding these for other wondering about the next planned Hornet.
they never shouldve added the F-15I. half the current issues with top tier can be traced to it
Well since I haven’t seen them you will have to understand why I won’t comment on that part.
But saying that imho all variants should be added tho it would be like missing some variants of the Spitfire.
I mean 139 people isn’t the most but thats not a small amount and considering the nordic TT has a very small amount of people who actively talk about it id consider our opinion should hold some right to at least make the devs reconsider.
i voted yes on that though. so i think solid portion might not be sweden player and just agree.
Understandable, again its a ****show every time he talks because he dodges our questions and blatantly tells us the the devs dont care. If we were to have him talk about it again like that day you’ll see him delete posts because he has to. He says one thing and it leads to more anger. Ask most of the active members in that conversation and they’ll tell you the same thing. Smin had to delete stuff because the entire thing is clearly a terrible decision but the snails gonna stand by it regardless.
Its again a pool of sharks and nothing except what we want to hear would actually make people happy.
Tbf theres maybe 30% on there who play sweden. I vote on stuff all the time even if ill never play the vehicle just because it fixes gaps in a tree
Around Q2 or Q3 2014 for F/A-18C (USMC/USN)
F/A-18E Early (Block 1 standard) in early 2000’s (pre Iraq War), but the F/A-18E Late 2014 ~ 2017
