Yep, so will have decent survivability then in SB. Especially as the MAWS shouldnt trigger randomly anymore and only when needed.
Also waiting on the Gr7 (and I assume the T10) to get 4x 1000lb GPS guided bombs. As well as there AGM-65s on the outer pylons
Dont they have brimstones as well, gonna be funny to use manipulating its VTOL
Thats a GR9 thing only i beleive. But only the original and not dual-mode. Though I think SAL only Brimstone would be fine for it and far less of a crime than the Brimstones in general are, if there is no MMW by the time its added
Sorry in advance lol.
The First generation Harriers are still missing a fair amount of STR around .6G the turn rate needs to further increased from around 12 degrees a second to near 14.
Couple this with the virtual instructor limiting the max load factor from 21 degrees AOA to just 16.5 its easy to see why they are so bad with mouse aim.
First Gen Harrier STR still too low after Dev Buff // Gaijin.net // Issues
Better to have premium cosmetics than anything gameplay-altering
I feel like a bum advertising here but please vote
Ooooo the Hornet is nasty in close ;) dang is this an up date or what! I’m way to Hyped!
That’d be/was an Su-85, guys
Reminds me … where’s Type-62Gai, Gaijin?
The very predecessor of ZTQ-15/VT-5.
Brownie pulls out an uno reverse on mihaly
Too late
Have the developers seen or even taken my thread into consideration in any capacity? I haven’t received any replies from you or Stona since I pinged yall, and it’s just been radio silent. If my suggestion has been considered and denied, I would really like to be told so in some way rather than being extremely disappointed and feeling ignored entirely when the Live server comes around without a TT Netz of the 1987 configuration.
It has currently the support of 165 polled players with an overwhelming support ratio. The silence on this matter feels quite deafening, and a response when possible would be very much appreciated as it’s something extremely important to me and many others. Thank you for your time if you’re reading this.
Good time for me to slide my F16B cope into this
plz devs, fix the tech tree netz and make this version an F16B (Iron eagle tribute)
Thank you :)
is there any reason as to why my bug report has seemingly been ignored, while others that are much newer have gotten responses?
as expected basher its always the same thing a complete radio silence for everything we ask, we ask about X missile (silence), we ask for guided munitions (silence), we ask for this (silence) and its the same situation with other things asked before.
Someone help me make sense of this report. This report is on the R-77-1, and it appears to be asking for the angle limits of the seeker to be removed, now how exactly does that work?
Р-77-1 | Углы целеуказания // Gaijin.net // Issues
Here’s what was inside the report:
It appears to be asking for ±180 degree tracking angle, how would that be implemented into Warthunder? That to my understanding is 360 degrees.
Datamine then shows this change for the R-77-1:
They do listen sometimes: We got mavericks for the F-15I, Derbys for the F-16s, And Sparrows for the F-16D. However they tend to not listen more often than not. I could go on for days about the issues they neglect…
You’d think that be fixed by now, 100% will be fix by the time it hits live.
But that config bug, is funny nevertheless.
I wouldnt be so sure. Hunter FGA9 still has the union jack despite being Rhodesian and that was reported nearly a year ago :D
