Because lockheed has to do most of the integration code and so probably using US based ones for tests or something.
I want me a rover Wombat it is such a silly car
when do the spice bombs in the files come ingame?
MBDA had to modify the meteor for use in internal stores. Not to say lockheed hasn’t been having teething issues with the block 4.
Scorpion my beloved
We tend to borrow the US ranges for missile tests, e.g. ASRAAM first flew and was fired from USAF F-16Cs. The integration work was carried out by BAE & MDBA iirc
As for marines itself probably because they operate the B model too so aircraft where available.
That makes sense. Yeah lockheed contracted BAE and MBDA to head the integration I forget how many dollars wit was.
dev server stuff, i have photos of the T.10 using BOL so i will report it if it get shafted with 60 countermesures. its already worse then the AV8B NA since its heavier with the tandem cockpit, so i hope gaijin gives it the BOL off rip
Spoiler
Ingame
Is that a MT-LB mockup of jpz 4-5?
My eyes
T-34 sans turret by the looks of it
Yep, for the BR, if its limited to 2 instead of 4 that would be fair, but none would almost be a deal breaker for me.
Another step closer to premium ammunition XD
- new premium account images:
yeah with 60 countermesures youre better off using the lighter, better cannon and ofc more CM AV8B NA. the only reason to pick this would be the 700 countermesures (380 with 2bol)
Yup. Heck, it would be hard to justify using the T10 over the Sea Harrier FRS1 in SB. I think the radar with IFF is more valuable than the Harrier II airframe without the CM increase that comes with it as well
TRUE, even in airRB that 0.3 increase for marginal flight performance after the buffs wouldnt even be worth it
besides, im insane and love the tandem design on this aircraft so who am i kidding, it could come with aim9g and 60cm and would pick it any day
Yeah, the USMC are the only ones with Block 4 F-35Bs, the RAF have some F-35s in California, but they aren’t Block 4 and I can’t imagine they’d be allowed to try integrating it on foreign operated aircraft, as a security concern
11.7 BR with 60 CMs, It looks epic and would love to have it, but I dont think I could justify buying it just for that,
11.3 with 60 CMs… Maybe? But still a hard sale
11.7 with 380 or 700 CMs… Would be pre-purchased potentially and definetly purchased soon ish
i will pre-purchase with BOL, if its 11.0 on main server (airrb) with no boll ill preorder
11.3 (airRB) without bol… ehhh i want it but ill wait till sale
Its in Gaijins Corner with this, since nobody will buy it over the american one if theyre after a harrier since its not a “real” harrier. Its a goofy much rarer and (in peoples opinion) uglier version. so the only real pre-orders will be people who are after a GR.7 alternate at 11.3 (like the old one) or an alternate to the AV8B NA, and neither of them are buying a harrier thats worse then one that already exists in every margin.
The only way this sells is if it get BOL.
either way im big reporting for BOL if it doesnt get it. i dont want too (as it should be coming on launch) but i will if i have too.
I got a tali on the jaguar gr1a iirc, but I am tempted to get this 1 simply as I love trainer jets and harriers.
Gotta wait and see, its that or I just talisman the SHAR next time its on sale for air to air xD
I think its better looking. it flows much better towards the rear of the canopy
Spoiler