yeah im aware but im saying how easy it is to implement a spall liner, maybe a bit more than a day i was a bit stupid there but if your gonna sit there and tell me it takes 3 years to implement your insane
well they got to make a model that has it give it working physical attributes make sure it’s not over or under armor test it fix it test again fix any and all bugs and then get an update where it can be added then have people test then it can go on live. Their not gonna do that cause well no document says it has one the only reason I know it has one myself is of a personal scource
yeah, this doesnt take 3 years.
is this not enough proof?
8 Likes
man i keep finding more things that intrest me, considering they began modeling detailed modules for apu’s on things like the t90’s why doesnt the m1a2sepv3 have its modeled its odd to me as that’s another one of its actually beneficial upgrades being able to have then engine off and stuff.
Now that Britain is getting an Abrams I can finally settle a long lasting disagreement I have had with some British mains on this forum.
There are a bunch of British mains that blame their mediocre GRB performance on having to play the Challenger 2. Now we can see if they suddenly become good players when they have an Abrams or if it was a true skill issue all along.
i think you’ll find it was never the players, the black night having the same K/D as the M1A2T while being a worse tank in like every way except iron first and the lack of a turret basket (rip that advantage) shows britain mains dont perform “mediocre” we just have the worst and least meta tanks at top tier and if you try tell me the black night is a better tank than the M1A2T i will hunt you down
Spoiler
edit: also i still dont get how you think britain mains are mediocre? the black night almost has the same K/D as the 2a7v which is widely considered the best top tier tank while the challengers widely considered the worst
Spoiler
i cant see into the future but i GARUNTEE the aussie sepv3 will have a much higher K/D than all the challengers as they are outright worse tanks
this is further proven by this, you give britain a good vehicle and woah look at the K/D of it
the Khalid and Shir 2 for example
Spoiler
And the TTD
Spoiler
Czech person here. Our vehicles are only in the USSR and our camos are in 3 or 4 different trees. 💀 (I DO NOT WANT TO PLAY USSR)
2 Likes
but unplayable
man i can grind an entire new toptier air vehchle in like underan hour on dev but grountd is taking an absorbent amnount of time to get one and i still have to get a second one wtf are grb rewards even
GRB rewards have been lackluster forever now. I can research almost two entire jets before I can research one tank of the same or similar br
I legitimatly think i would be able to researtch 4 in the time its taking me to just unlock trophy
please just raise the GR.1s BR to 11.7 so that it can get the ALARMs. It is a major weapon for the air frame and excluding it just because its current BR is just dissapointing.
It’s not even like it would ruin the air frame, it already has a wide array of equipment that is useful, the addition of ALARM would only increase its effectiveness. the A-10C, F-4J, F-111F, A-7K, SU-25SM3, Mig-23MLD/ ML, Harrier T10, F-5E/ T, and the F-104S ASA are all aircraft at 11.7 and are arguably or very obviously far worse platforms than the tornado GR.1. if anything the gr.1 is under-tiered and the ALARM addition would bring it to where it should truly be.
Well if these British mains that I had the disagreement with unlock the M1A2C and personally manage to maintain at least a 2 K/D in it I’ll happily admit I was wrong.
I think you should also account for all the improvements the M1’s can receive this update
2 Likes
doesn’t DM73 Require the L/55A1 gun to be shot because it’s got more Chamber pressure than the others?
1 Like
Can you drop your support comments on this topic?
1 Like
Which is why everyone is upset.
1 Like
I’m certain it’s possible just have to submit a bug report and wait 10 years with them saying it won’t change anything so why add it.
He’s saying list the source and what it says.
They don’t want to read your sources for what you are bug reporting so you list your source and what is in it to be changed.