someone on forums i cant remember who you were sorry they went into blender and made a lfp spall liner mockup in like 5 minutes, at most it would take them like a day to implement spall liners on the lfp and hull side but 3 years? your kidding and as far as im aware the ready reack is most likely changing a few lines of code and thats it
theres a huge difference between waiting for an entire submarine and waiting for something so simple like spall liners
(Couldn’t be bothered to read the next ~900 replies)
IIRC KH-31 has a ramjet. It doesn’t function like Meteor’s so it’s basically full send until it runs out of fuel
Again, to my (limited) knowledge of it
I guess with many things like the I Derby dual pulse motor buff not that long ago, this is Gaijin’s first implementation of a ramjet. Next stop: throttleable ramjet 🚀
lol i was having a look at the new Swedish premiums a supersonic jet at 11.0 with 4 aim9Ls and two slightly worse missiles is insane things like the f5e at the same br gets two aim9j’s lol
its a wip but so far the abrams can barely pen the t80u with m829a3 which is really stupid btw considering l27a1 is supposed to be able to lolpen the ufp
It would make angling the front around corners effective again. I used to do it before the code on the armor got changed to where you get penned even at extreme angles.
yeah im aware but im saying how easy it is to implement a spall liner, maybe a bit more than a day i was a bit stupid there but if your gonna sit there and tell me it takes 3 years to implement your insane
well they got to make a model that has it give it working physical attributes make sure it’s not over or under armor test it fix it test again fix any and all bugs and then get an update where it can be added then have people test then it can go on live. Their not gonna do that cause well no document says it has one the only reason I know it has one myself is of a personal scource
man i keep finding more things that intrest me, considering they began modeling detailed modules for apu’s on things like the t90’s why doesnt the m1a2sepv3 have its modeled its odd to me as that’s another one of its actually beneficial upgrades being able to have then engine off and stuff.
Now that Britain is getting an Abrams I can finally settle a long lasting disagreement I have had with some British mains on this forum.
There are a bunch of British mains that blame their mediocre GRB performance on having to play the Challenger 2. Now we can see if they suddenly become good players when they have an Abrams or if it was a true skill issue all along.
i think you’ll find it was never the players, the black night having the same K/D as the M1A2T while being a worse tank in like every way except iron first and the lack of a turret basket (rip that advantage) shows britain mains dont perform “mediocre” we just have the worst and least meta tanks at top tier and if you try tell me the black night is a better tank than the M1A2T i will hunt you down
Spoiler
edit: also i still dont get how you think britain mains are mediocre? the black night almost has the same K/D as the 2a7v which is widely considered the best top tier tank while the challengers widely considered the worst
Spoiler
i cant see into the future but i GARUNTEE the aussie sepv3 will have a much higher K/D than all the challengers as they are outright worse tanks
this is further proven by this, you give britain a good vehicle and woah look at the K/D of it
man i can grind an entire new toptier air vehchle in like underan hour on dev but grountd is taking an absorbent amnount of time to get one and i still have to get a second one wtf are grb rewards even