ok tbf it cant get front penned by 30mm bmpt gun as easy, shooting turret ring of abrams with apds is so funny
The one thing I’ll say is USUALLY, when a new variant get introduced to a tree, not everything but some major bug reports get actioned upon. Like you say I’ll take what I can get, but man it’d be nice to see the accepted reports be implemented. I’d give back the five second reload in a heartbeat for changes and a clean Abrams lol
1 Like
na it can ive been killed in the challenger 2 so many times by the 30mm from the front its dumb
Dont worry, theres almost no chance A3 is modeled correctly
And it got fixed already by a player (literally just a single value has to be changed in the code), so they would just have to go there, change the number, save the file → wait for the next deployment window. A thing of not even a minute as the place and value are already known…
1 Like
1985 SAC
Standard Aircraft Characteristics
@Nostalgistic put it in his suggestion for it
And I know for a fact he isn’t stupid
While it never carried it in service, it suggests it was fully capable of doing so
3 Likes
Suffren could have come with California and the russian thing i can’t remember the name of
Assuming Japan, UK, Germany and Italy got something too
2 Likes
UK could have had a Type 21, Type 22 or Type 42
depending on if they want to add a frigate or destroyer
A lot of it is the inability to return fire, and the mis-representation of what makes the Abrams deadly
1 Like
conveniently ignored what i had sent again
I believe they’re storing regen steering only due to the fact it could potentially be detrimental to CQBs mobility.
And since the playerbase—somehow—likes CQB at high/top tier, adding it would spark a whole painting palette of complaints.
The Challenger 2s have a wierd hole/bug in their armour where HE autocanon rounds will just overpressure and kill crew
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/oUKPJBBvm1pq
1 Like
“Planned”
Just like the IRST on the Yak-141.
Some aircraft can get their planned equipment but why can’t some others?
4 Likes
Day 8 (it’s past 12am for me now) advocating Gaijin not to split SG vehicles up.
Honestly I’m getting more and more hopeless with it, I’m just huffing dangerous amounts of copium atp. Hopefully tmr’s dev stream wont disappoint.
1 Like
We already have Su-24M,the base one have upgrade for it
Fully capable is perhaps an incorrect term for it. It was documented that it was planned and intended to arm F-14D with AIM-120As, but was cancelled (went with the LANTIRN integration instead).
The fact that we have documented plans for it should be sufficient for Gaijin. It’s up to them if they want to add it or not to keep it distant from the F-14B.
2 Likes
You do know that irl abrams crews have been reoorted reloading the gun in 3-4 second intervals right? The 5 secind reload for expert crews in of itself are already generous to other nations
2 Likes
I can’t really see the reason why it would?
3BM60 at 500m which is on the lower penning side so please again tell me the Abrams has a worse survivability then the 3TD
1 Like
i mean the new radar 7P and 9M should be enough for it
AIM-120A would push it into a BR where it would be DOA anyway