and the challenger 3 TD with worse mobility and far worse survivability still have the six second reload so if that has a six second reload there is no reason the Abrams should have a 5 second reload
hell I dont think the base Abrams should have a 5 second reload when compared to the Challenger 2s and Ariettes that have worse mobility, survivability and in the challengers case worse pen
whats with people swearing up and down that the abrams is bad lol
it was fired from an F-14A using heavily changed internals and new rails you cant just give a D the AMRAAMs
Its not so much swearing up and down that its bad, so much as its beyond modled wrong compared to irl
US mains do that alot tbh its good aside from the later ones being heavy
It’s a cover of a song called “Hysteria”. Original was a big hit in the early 2000s for the band, Muse.
I don’t know whose version was used in the trailer, but it’s not the original
Ed:- video description says who performs it:
Music - “Hysteria” by The Baltic House ft. Kerensa
Written by Matthew J Bellamy
Matt Bellamy being Muse’s lead singer/songwriter
that may be true, but it just means theres potential for it to be way better. its still a great tank imo and my stats back it up
which still have far better mobility then even the lightest Challenger 2 so I dont get it
written before the integration was cancelled
Yak-141 might have a word:
Challenger 3 TD is 12.0, not 12.7, so it’s naturally not meant to be a 2A7 counterpart like SEPv2s are supposed to be.
In any case, you know I think 3TD should have a 5 second reload, I don’t know why you suddenly bring it up to write about how much better the Abrams are by comparison xD
By the way, CR3TD does NOT have worse survivability” than the Abrams. It doesn’t have a turret basket nor half the modules, it has a 560mm LE hull vs 355, it has spall liners, crew is more spaced out.
No, im all for 2a7v and 122’s to go to 13.0 or even 13.3 with fixed 2a7v armor
But adding a sep v2 with a3 and 5s reload is unfair for other nation that already struggle at 12.7, sure it may be fair if it only fight 2a7v’s or 122’s but is it fair vs type10? Ariete? leclerc? Merkava? that 4 tank vs 2a7v atleast have advantage in reload so they can be sure if they can outreload 2a7v even tough they are inferior in round and or armor, but vs sepv2 with a3 and 5s reload? What advantage do they have
yak-141 did actually carry and have everything integrated onto its airframe, not the same as giving an entirely different variant something from a one off testbed airframe
not only that the lineup is far superior to uk AND germany id go as far as saying its the 2nd or 3rd best lineup in the game (especially this coming update, it might be 2nd)
People have always complained about it while its the 2nd if not the best tank in the game (12.0 Abrams’ are undisputed best tank for their BR out of everything top tier at the moment), some people are just worse and blame the tank
20 hours for me to riot if F-14 and J-22 are premiums
Me reading this turns to dust.
why is it missing R-77?
It is a great tank, but the glaring inaccuracy portrayed in-game makes it a lot less than what it actually is. The main reason I drive this point home so much is to not normalize choosing one nation’s tanks over another.