No it doesnt it means i made a mistake but my argument is still valid and you havent produce a credible reason yet
It’s very frustrating to communicate with you when you completely ignore every justification and reasoning for things when it comes to other countries, but when it comes to Japan, you throw everything out of the window as long as it’s to their / your benefit.
I said it earlier and I’ll say it again, you need to escape the one nation main mentality.
Play some other countries a bit. Experience that the grass is not always greener on the other side. Gain some more perspective as to why things are the way they are beyond your own tech tree, and you’ll discover Japan isn’t being neglected nor treated unfairly to the degree you think they are.
The adats was prototype the xm975 was a test bed neither saw service with american forces NEITHER
no point arguing, the snail at least has the ability to think as much as not doing what they want so they are wasting time, im going to bed now so if you carry on, good luck
Okay give me a justification you think actually works for not giving the adats to japan I will wait
When will you get that ability is the question
Me too mate. This is exhausting lol. Like talking to a brick wall.
Just encountered a load of Fujis, damn they are strong, with 4 second reload should probably be 11.7 not 11.3
You confuse you not having a valid argument
See what you should really look out for is a firing line of Bkans
The fact that Thailand seems to have only used one as a static emplacement.
You just want to argue and you cant really come up with a justification to deny a pretty reasonable thing to give japanese ground forces . Because you just dont like japan or just want to argue with me
And thailiand is in the game right ?
I’ve literally watched half a dozen people try and explain things to you this past hour or so and you ignore all of it.
It’s just Japan Japan Japan back. Nothing is good enough. Every strength is a weakness. Every weakness requires a broken solution. It’s exhausting.
Have a good night mate.
Its perfectly valid point you just dont want to agree with me and want to argue. BUT what you have not the slightest reasonable argument against it
It’s a static emplacement, not a vehicle based system, so it will never be added.
Name a solution then I will wait I will wait to hear what is being done to fix JAPAN IM ALL EARS PLEASE TELL ME WHAT you think gaijin is doing but ignoring JAPAN
The americans have the non-static one two of them and they were never used so ?
Then give a solution yourself let me shot it down in front of you to solve japans problems
I explained to you the difference. You ignored it. There is no communicating when you come at everything with such a biased and unreasonable perspective, which constantly shifts and contradicts to fit Japans interests.
Nothing more to add. o7.