There is a difference between using a Subtree / Subnation as a way of implementing vehicles into a tree the core nation never used itself, and adding completely fictitious vehicles.
Did america ever have any Merkava’s ?
Tha adat is a prototype and america made two of them
Its no more fictitious in america then it would be going to japan.
Okay, so let me ask you this.
If you think Japan getting an ADATs is fine, would you be okay with the US getting a Type-10?
America doesnt need them but sure they GOT MERKAVAS DIDNT THEY
Just you wait until Sweden gets an up-armoured abrams when the win rates tank with this new premium
Also why does Britain get a India T90
So no argument to giving the japanese a adats
They are in the Commonwealth of Nations
Why does Japan get Thai F-5Es?
1 Like
YEAH AND JAPAN IS IN A MILITARY ALLIANCE WITH US. Oh no wait japan actually isnt our ally
Good point because they havew them and make them but also that is a point for giving them the adats dont you think
Why not give japan a adats ?
So is the rest of nato and even people outside of nato, you’d never believe Sweden has had a military alliance with the US since 1975
No, Did Thailand or Japan operate the ADATS?
Do they not have gear in those nations Oh I must of imagined those odd tanks like a british made spaa IN THE AMERICAN TANK TREE
DID AMERICA ? the made two prototypes
Thailand does have an ADATS. It’s just attached to a brick and can’t move.
1 Like
Which british made spaa is in the US tree?