That’s understandable. Don’t get me wrong, I’d much rather have the domestic stuff than Mav’s anyway, i’m just struggling to find what exactly it is that would technically enable them on F-15E, that F15I may or may not lack.
I’m seeing tons of threads of people saying ‘Give US one 229’s and Israeli one Mavericks’, but I can’t find anything either proving or disproving the Ra’am’s ability to actually do that.
Not only is it amazing to give us great perspective about the sizes of the vehicles; it’s also perfect for closely inspecting the models, be it to appreciate their quality or look for mistakes to report.
dunno if anyone noticed, but nice change for the Tornado GR.4: it got Litening III modelled now and they took pity I suppose because they modelled it (wrongfully) as gen 3 (1200x800). They did model the zoom levels correct though, and it’s better than Litening II, with max zoom being roughly on par with the ASELPOD (~x100 zoom, btw ASELPOD also has gen 3 thermal wrongfully so perhaps it’s just intentionally wrong).
Its built by Canada, but was a program between Canada and the UK, both used American designs but was tweaked by Canada (Grizzly Hull and LAV III respectively).
on a more positive note. Has the team considered the placement of the J-10A?
Because as it currently stands not only does it just not make sense with the surrounding vehicles, but due to the sheer number of aircraft the PLAAF and ROCAF can muster, being strictly locked to 3 lines (Taiwan, China, Strike) is gonna clog things up very quickly.
a 4th column starting from rank 7 is not a crazy concept.
It would make more sense to atleast put the Mirage 2000 before the J-10, preferably without a connection. So the Mirage 2000 is the end of the taiwanese line