Major Update "Firebirds" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

Mavericks were only tested on F-15E. and F-15I is different than USAF F-15E on many levels. IAF also operates their own A2G munitions instead.

ah i’m not up to date with the chinese missiles then

Also, reminds me the mica diameter is still 165mm instead of 160, wonder if they’ll fix it one day

On the topic of the 2000D RMV

CAN WE GET IR PGMS PLEASE
Because both the Tornado and this thing CAS wise are unremarkable for their BRs… this would be a good buff. IR PGMs got passed 5 months ago.

2 Likes

wait until the dev blog

can we may finally fix fakour90 so it can be chaffed?

That’s understandable. Don’t get me wrong, I’d much rather have the domestic stuff than Mav’s anyway, i’m just struggling to find what exactly it is that would technically enable them on F-15E, that F15I may or may not lack.

I’m seeing tons of threads of people saying ‘Give US one 229’s and Israeli one Mavericks’, but I can’t find anything either proving or disproving the Ra’am’s ability to actually do that.

1 Like

Theyre in flight manual…

Oh damn Mirooge 2KD RMV.
Where IIR + INS Hammer tho?

3 Likes

I formally request this to be permanently enabled as new feature.


Not only is it amazing to give us great perspective about the sizes of the vehicles; it’s also perfect for closely inspecting the models, be it to appreciate their quality or look for mistakes to report.

40 Likes

JA37D has no RWR indicators in the cabin. At all.

Bruuh.

dunno if anyone noticed, but nice change for the Tornado GR.4: it got Litening III modelled now and they took pity I suppose because they modelled it (wrongfully) as gen 3 (1200x800). They did model the zoom levels correct though, and it’s better than Litening II, with max zoom being roughly on par with the ASELPOD (~x100 zoom, btw ASELPOD also has gen 3 thermal wrongfully so perhaps it’s just intentionally wrong).

So open about this, really hope it’s dropping today!

So, to sum it up, it’s like the Skink but Modern?

Its built by Canada, but was a program between Canada and the UK, both used American designs but was tweaked by Canada (Grizzly Hull and LAV III respectively).

So yeah, makes perfect sense to add to the UK ngl

on a more positive note. Has the team considered the placement of the J-10A?

Because as it currently stands not only does it just not make sense with the surrounding vehicles, but due to the sheer number of aircraft the PLAAF and ROCAF can muster, being strictly locked to 3 lines (Taiwan, China, Strike) is gonna clog things up very quickly.

a 4th column starting from rank 7 is not a crazy concept.

1 Like

Thanks for agreeing with us. You seem to be a very smart man.
God Save the King

2 Likes

Just need to combine J-11 and J-11A into a folder, and then install J-10A and the problem is solved

Spoiler

just-house.gif

Makes up for the TIALD being Gen 1 on Tornado

is this a joke or?

Nope