Show a picture or any proof showing that F-15I can use Mavericks and you can get them. Thats all it takes.
1 Like
You are talking about “theorically” MICA-EM can be adapted and used in the Mirage 2000D-RMV while this is completely impossible. As I said this is completely different from the JAS39 situation.
No, I’m using Smin reason to add AGM65G to Sweden to refute some remarks that the F-15I cannot be given to it because it is not purchased. You need to look up at my remarks before and after.
I wait gajin add AGM-142 Popeye series for F-111C, F-15I Ra’am and F-4E Kurnass 2000 in the next major update or first major update 2025
Excuse me, for GBU-15(V)21/B. Now in CDK file ?
But I never saw F-15E (USAF) armed GBU-15(V)21/B
Only b52 carried Popeye in USAF, and although the F-15E could probably mount them we don’t know if the wiring and software is compatible
Popeye on 111c would cause a huge BR bump and UK has it’s own domestic cas options for higher BR.
111C should’ve gone to US anyways but that’s already done
I’m still waiting for a Thai sub-TT for Japan.
Sure hope everything will be unique, it would be really pathatic if it would take that long for a sub-TT just to be C&P.
4 Likes
I hate to be the guy considering there has been more than enough evidence of sweden being able to mount and use the AGM 65 so why are we still talking sweden when the SAAF gripen has never once mounted any AGM 65? Idk seems better to cry about them than the nation that has better reason to have them.
1 Like
Whether it’s 11.3 or 12.0, doesn’t really change anything at the moment. It still faces the same aircraft either way. But might aid it in actually be usable in the current mess that is top tier compression.
As for air modes. Should have no impact
Does Thailand have any unique modifications of aircraft? Im not familiar with their vehicles.
Popeye would put it at max BR for ground
Which it basically already is. I see no reason to bring the F-111C over any of the other options in the British tree. They all have better weapons and defensive suites
And it’s got like 2x the range of kh38 I think there should be some more counters implemented before we get more of these longer range agm
That is a valid reason not to get them, but also, we need some hard counters to Pantsir. Now Brimstones have been dashed for that
Dumb bombs only
AGM-65 integration was applied only later on with Peace Rhine. We cant assume F-4F got tri-mount AGM-65 capability when these jets initially had no AGM-65 capability at all. Germans upgraded them with Mavericks and provided this capability with single rails only. There’s no evidence suggesting FCS being able to operate with six Mavericks or tri-mounts at all.
Spoiler
1 Like
I don’t worried because know gajin increase BR for ground RB & SB higher 12.0 someday
I might wait gajin add AGM-130A & AGM-130C for F-15E in the winter 2024 or first major update update 2025
And in the future gajin decompressed max BR to 13.0 or 13.3 for strike aircraft and Multirole combat aircraft in ground RB & SB mode ?
I can cope lol
Really? So why does the IAF F16C, which shows Gaijin the photo of AGM65, only gets a sentence “Not a Bug”?
You will only be sophistry without admitting that Gaijin has indeed implemented double standards in this regard.
4 Likes
Update when?
There were some bigger enhanced paveways found in the files as unused models.
Seeing as the RMV already gets the 500lb version iirc, these will probably also go to the RMV.