It has come to my attention that there’s an enormous inconsistency among Amagi and Mutsu’s turret/elevator module modelling;
Do you know if this is planned to be fixed on the next update? I think it’s a pretty big inconsistency which can easily be fixed, but I don’t recall this issue being solved on the Dev Server.
Again people also forget the SAAF gripen has never used AGM 65’s yet people only see sweden lmao. Regardless the gripens have the ability to carry them so gaijin added them. If you can prove that the F15I has the same rails as the F15E then they should be added. Its the same thing the German players were trying to argue for with the KWS, they want the 3 AGM mount but since they couldn’t prove it iirc they are stuck with one missile per rail.
That’s right. At present, many people will only reread the F-15I once and again. They did not buy AGM65 and forgot that the Swedish JAS39C was not purchased, but they can get the ability to have it in the game by obtaining approval.
Eh, gaijin kinda picks and chooses with some things, theoretical is a maybe if they add it, but if it did exist even if on a different platform they normally add it. Im for balance personally so that nations without CAS can have something until a proper platform arrives. Like japan F15 should carry some stuff and the KWS should get the tri mount imo but thats a pretty heated topic.
According to Gaijin’s approach to the Swedish JAS39C, it can be completely useable unless it can be proved that the F-15 exported to Israel has castrated the ability to launch AGM65.