Not what I was saying, but okay.
Hundreds of thousands is hyperbole. So is the 80% of nations not in game, but I see your point, okay.
There is no red-for vs blu-for MM system. I’ve played in WW2 era games where it’s the Germans, US, and Soviets, vs the French, British, Italians, and Japanese. I’ve played coldwar games where it’s the Soviets, US, and Sweden vs UK, China, and Germany. None of the games make any sense.
Germany by the way, already has two cold war lines it splits down post WW2, East and West. Red and Blue. China has a tree that was technically at Civil war before and after WW2 with a hodgepodge of vehicles that splits into PRC and RoC, arguably for most of the coldwar as Red and Blue as well.
Sweden was “neutral” from before WW2 until just this year, and yet they have a bunch of quasi-redfor vehicles from Finland, who fought mostly against the Soviets in WW2.
Point is, there’s already a ton of contradictions to the whole on one side in WW2 on another side in the Cold War thing that just doesn’t make it a boundary worth observing.
I appreciate your passion, but what are we really missing that could, for a single nation as a stand-alone, let alone a subtree, fill out from the WW2 side on that hasn’t been added, or wouldn’t benefit from being filled in by other similar vehicles in a “coalition” style tree?