Russian fanaticism at its finest.
I rest my case.
T-90M is the only tank that’s in the top 10 MBTs in War Thunder, and that’s by combining Strv 122s and M1A2 SEP with the others.
2S38 is a standard 10.0 that Sweden had for much longer.
1 Like
Dude, maybe I am a little emotional cuz of rounds after rounds killed in any ridiculous angers, shot down by panstirs, defeated which may lead me to be like this.
Finally you take a time to think about all things you said.
3 Likes
You are still talking about a tank on the botton in win rate table as a BEST ONE
Again, go and check the win rate table
Just so crazy about that, cant take it any more,
Perhaps I need other games to comfort me, LOL any recommands?
And which countries you have played?
YouTube videos, just stop for a while.
1 Like
However, russian vehicles act best in mixed combats, no matter GF AF or anything plays, their performance is extremly overpowered
I researched all in USA GER USSR and Sweden, and which coutries r u playing dude
Win rate is team skill.
Vehicle performance is KDR math, and player consistency is KMR.
Stock performance; both decent, but also need more battles in both.
Spaded performance:
Would you look at that, M1A2 is identical to the T-72B3 and T-80U in performance which gives me a strong indication all 3 are BR’d correctly in relation to each other.
Cross-analysis of capabilities further proves they’re BR’d correctly.
And win rate? I had team mates with more skill on average when playing T-80U and T-72B3, that is all win rate will ever prove.
And I almost never bring SPAA or CAS when playing the Soviets…
Edit: I looked at your stats and your USA stats is similar to your Soviet and Swedish stats.
1 Like
I’m not about in general, but last time that made you write this post
Don’t u feel that 1 out of 3 russian players are noobs and 2 out of 3 USA players are???
The main issue is, once M1A2s taken damage, they lost ability to fight back, as for T80s or T90s? There is a great possibility to surivive and kill their enemies, Abrams are just junks in War Thunder so that the snail made them a fire rate of 5 rounds/S.
Just Look at the poor 39% winrate.
Survivability onion makes you a better player:
Don’t be seen.
If seen don’t be shot at.
If shot at don’t be hit.
If hit don’t be penned.
If penned don’t be destroyed.
Worrying about the final 2 means you’re not trying to do the first three.
I don’t and won’t belittle people for their stats.
So if YOU feel like your performance in War Thunder isn’t to your personal goal, adopt the survivability onion into your playstyle.
However, your performance is consistent among MBTs currently regardless of which tech tree you’re playing, and that is something that is admirable.
Congrats on being consistent, as consistency is hard to manage.
I literally JUST A FEW SECONDS AGO shot Abrams in the face, took his Cannon breach and he killed me 2 seconds later! Do I now make a thread about how Abrams is invincible? I was not in a RU tank but in Fuji. Go touch some grass or something and stop trolling here. RU tank if penetrated in LFP its DEAD, side shot aswell. Get the cannon breach and you are 99% to kill one of the crew members and if you do it again its dead anyway since the crew is down. Abrams has a whole town in its tank and you need to pick them one by one, plus no ammo detonation due to its design
2 Likes
Now u will see much more horrible tanks, guess what?
Ur rounds can not pen T80BVM or T90M on the side in some cases, why it doesont happen on any other tanks?
WHAT?! What ammo are you using? What game are you playing even?!
The Viking strf9040s have that advanced gunsights, u wont say so if u played any of them
let’s see, u will cry when ur DM53 not pen on the side of T80BVM later or soon
I am wondering how much time u played in top tier
The Abrams fires at just under 10 rpm (6.5 second reload) with no crew skills, and 12 rpm (5 second reload) when maxed
2 Likes