Nothing changed between it and live for the upper plate, so that’s irrelevant.
7 Likes
Yeah the ufp doesn’t bounce still, even at 81-82 degrees its ridiculous. I’ve died several times due to this.
1 Like
The point is not what it is immune to, the point is that the armor of A7V is completely wrong bro
yeh it is.
KK just tested and seems like the autobounce is bugged still, unluckers. my bad.
1 Like
598mm at 100m killed loader, engine and transmition
Sure at this angle you can ricocheat ufp but from here you can easily shoot the turret ring, driver hatch and LFP so i still dont get your point. In very few situations do you have control about what angle your UFP is espeically so in urban enviroments.
You can even ricocheat into the turret ring from one spot. This is all in a custom game too.
5 Likes
Hm now i just wondering are they really imbecile or they just pretended to be one?
Swedish tender my A what is a god damn German tank have to do with Swedish tender?
maybe they don’t like to talk like normal people maybe action is what they want yeah and great job screwed over people that wasting time finding info for these guys
Regardless thats not the point of this thread, there are still issues like mobility, model errors or ammunition.
thx for all your work guys but the snail just wont listen
Can we not give up so easily?Please, every one of you players is a force, as long as we are united.We should unite with players from other countries.
Boycotts again? We forced their hand last time, i don’t think its gonna work a second time…
2 Likes
It won’t quite work this time, the last time it happened it was because of a change that affected basically everyone in the community. This only affects people who play top tier, so the boycott will have a limited effect methinks
3 Likes
So what other methods do we have?
except for leaking classified infos ?
None
Should we draw sticks who will leak them ?
Lmao :D
Nor will they accept documents that reveal secrets
I mean I have some rough ideas but they honestly will probably fail. I’ll still list them.
-
Some sort of a poll on how the community feels about Gaijin’s implementation of heavily researched bug reports. Also moving forward, what even is the point of making researched bug reports if they are poorly implemented or not even implemented at all?
-
mega list of underperforming aspects for nato mbts (ex. 2a7V still doesn’t bounce apfsds on ufp, no DU or D-tech…Leclerc armor still doing jack)
-
More resources spent on processing and implementing bugreports on Gaijins part. Currently it seems like no matter how many sources you have, even if God himself said so, it is not enough. ‘This is a secondary source’. Issue closed, not a bug.
-
More direct dialogue with the developers. The developers should actually read the bug report/suggestion, and spend time on the information that has been passed over to them. Some bug reports have even dozens of sources corroborating a fact and yet they are ignored, simply because they ‘believe it to not be so’.
-
Listing of sources used for changes made to vehicles in bugfixes and their reasoning.
1 Like
pretty do like post to get rid of stock HEAT poll do it seem to work
1 Like
Frustrating that german Leopards are that much worse than swedish ones, even if they’re almost 30 years more modern.
2 Likes
clearly all countrys are as backwards as russia…
Why make better armor if you can slap era/nera on top of it and say it stops 9000mm
…
1 Like
has someone made a bug report about this already? The original hullroof armor is 82° for both strv 122 and 2a7v its just the additional armor on top of it thats diffrent on the strv 122
1 Like