The images are from a different vehicle shown in a youtube video though.
Or so blurry that you can’t see any details at all.
Additionally there is zero descriptions of what that part actually is, for all anyone knows those could just be removable safety stops that they have in during transport and shows to minimize risk of hurting passers by. Or they are what the report claims, but with the sources provided that will just be guesses at that point.
They NEVER use classified information. I’ve seen several public videos of the Leo swinging it’s turret around and the barrel lifting at the back, at the same spot, to the same height. It’s not that hard to get an estimate from that.
From the SM-SV turret, still. In fact, a picture of the SM-SV that is “blurry” is from the certain frontline in Eastern Europe i.e in combat conditions, so saying it’s just “removable safety handles” is lwk stupid as they’ve been present on EVERY Russian SPAAG since the Tunguska :P
Additionally there is zero descriptions of what that part actually is
It’s welded gun-rests meant to stop the gun from hitting the hull lol, the missiles literally have something similar. You don’t have to make excuses for Gaijin laddie.
They NEVER use classified information. I’ve seen several public videos of the Leo swinging it’s turret around and the barrel lifting at the back, at the same spot, to the same height. It’s not that hard to get an estimate from that.
Yeah, they did. You may be clueless, but they did use one to change the Leo 2 :P
They also rejected videos of the M1 elevating its barrel to prevent it from hitting the engine deck :P
Turrets can (and do) undergo modifications when fitted to new hulls though.
To blurry to make out anything relevant in, to say that the thing seen is the same part is just going to be a guess due to how blurry that image is. To me personally it even looks different in size compared to the other images. The thing circled in the blurry image is at the height of just above the middle missile tube, the thing shown in the other images are just below the same tube.
And where is the source proving that this statement is correct?
If your report hasn’t been handled for that long then you can message the Technical Moderators and ask about it. You can find all the teams and the areas they handle listed here: (Who is who and Reporting Procedure). If you don’t get an answer within a few days you can add more moderators from the list to the original message instead of sending a new message (that way you preserve the date of the message and it doesn’t look like a new request), adding one of the moderators to the message every 2-3 days or so until you get an answer.
Please do not to add the seniors until you have tried all other regular moderators, the Seniors likely won’t answer unless they are added and pinged by the regular moderators but if you’ve added all the regular moderators with no answer then you can add the seniors.
The problem is that this is a show and not real combat! We are playing a game in real combat so i just don’t think that safety would be on if they need to engage someone that is behind them
Nope, i can’t. Game Master handle in-game chat and name bans. I just know the requirements for reports.
“use your eyes” , well, there is nothing that shows that it’s permanently installed and not removable (at least parts of it, there is a line that splits it ~1/3 of the way up).
And no, i just know how reporting in general works and estimation and guesses based on the same turret mounted on a different hull isn’t going to cut it even close to being acceptable.
Then show proof of that.
Then clue me in WITH PROOF. I would love to be proven wrong here, because then it’s actually reportable and can be fixed. So far it’s nothing but conjecture and a person stating things out of thin air.
I could make something like the first image in a day. (sidenote, i recommend looking at the fan made models for WT on WT:live WT Live // Best models for the past week )
If you don’t have the original source and can show that the original source is an acceptable source then there is no point.
For which there shouldn’t be a need for - Gaijin themselves accepted that for the S1 variant, the gun-rests limit the depression, but for SM-SV they’re only cosmetic. Somehow.
If this was something benefitting other nations, there wouldn’t be a need for a “source” (which is just laughable that both you and Gaijin think there needs to be a source needed that the gun cannot just phase through a solid piece of steel).
Then again, Kh-38MTs seeker is literally dozens of times better than it should be just cus Gaijin thinks so ))))
I don’t see it in the first image (also doesn’t look like it’s on the same hull as the vehicle in-game but i’m uncertain on that point) and the second is again a unsourced 3D CAD model (of a different vehicle).
I don’t know how more i can explain it to you. you need to provide a source for your claims and not just images, and the images/source must be on the exact vehicle you are reporting.
I don’t know how more i can explain it to you. you need to provide a source for your claims and not just images, and the images/source must be on the exact vehicle you are reporting.
