Don’t own, sadly can’t test.
They do elevate the gun at around the ~150-210 degree area. If you are referring to the thin black sheets that stick up from the center of the back, i’m not certain but i think those are made of rubber and wont effect the barrel at all.
Again, if you find specific examples where it’s wrongly implemented then report it. But as far as i know most MBT’s that have the feature IRL has it in game so i don’t think there is any selectiveness there.
case and point to autoloader spall
we all know whats up with it, is there an explanation?
naH
Whataboutism won’t get you very far in practically any argument. I don’t recommend it.
just pointing out the existence of it.
i am of the opinion that people who claim the top brass is somehow unbiased is… idealistic at best
ive already mentioned the tunguska and co
I don’t think it is modeled
While loading in stationary tank, reload rate might be slower in game however in a moving tank it could be even slower if gaijin does make human reloading realistic
However if gaijin does decide to do that then human loading tank should get way quicker loading time during early matches and when they are stationary and
Really? Out of all leopard firing video that i have seen, their gun is reseted after firing a round. So i thought it was necessary
If you see in this video, the gun keeps on going up after firing each round
You can see at 4:05 that even during a basic show the canon need to go up when turrets turns.
Entirely possible that all the gun elevation in this video over the back was made manually.
Angle is inconsistent and it doesn’t level upon leaving the “blocked” angles.
It does the same movement both times and it “jumps” between elevation angles instead of having a smooth movement. You can’t manually make inputs like that to the FCS. Also how would the gunner elevate the gun manually, he can’t really see the gun in relation to the hull from inside the turret.
no only 2s6 much russian toptier mbts gun cliping in hull or structural steel but this no problem…
in video ap do a 160 grade turn and afther this the gun looking up u opition this is same? my opinion yeah is realistic but to much nerfed… fk not same,
M1A1 HC barrel also clips through the dozer blade. This is not unique to Russian tanks/ anti air alone. IIRC none of the turrets in game when attached to the tank (and the tank is not destroyed) can clip through the hull and objects. That is why your barrel clip through the wall
yeah and the loading way short 4-5 sec
its not necessary, just makes it easier for the loader (doesnt have to raise the ammo as high)
in contrast, the autoloaders are not flexible
If you believe that other NATO MBT also have it then why don’t you make a bug report about it? TBH i have not see any video of other NATO MBT doing same. (Atleast i have not seen this happening with abram. Infact I have a video where the abram hits it engine deck with its main gun)
If you meant about the clipping, then M1A1 HC barrel does clip through the dozer blade
Ohk, but then why does abram not do the same then?
People tried and were told “not a bug” actually.
Some tried to also report SM-SV’s gun barrels literally clipping through the barrel-stops and some tech mods went “I don’t believe you”…
Got any examples?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/JgcRyQsVQSwU
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/F2DITrbCMeeO
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/FLEJoJ27gtuc
Just a few.
None of these are examples of what you said though.
Not answered or handled.
Known issue: ( Community Bug Reporting System )
Not answered or handled.
Making it worse.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/gGHESqv9CC1x
Here’s the funny SM-SV report.
