and damn shame that we have two heavy tanks and both are premiums.
and if the leak is correct, wich it seems to be, Sweden will get no other veichle either. wich feels worse somehow.
1 Like
Always surprises me how angry some people on the internet get when somebody calls out the obvious… Or would you not say that this KV is not the most similar looking to the WoT KV 1 that we have ingame rn? Absolute fucking goober
How daring, a KV-1. This thing is going to be crazy with Swedish mains running it
Depends on the BR. Again 4.7 it wont have a lineup, well a good lineup since they have all 4.0 TD’s and a 4.3 TD(spaa) 5 0 and it probably wont be all that great since the turret cant angle since its a cast turret.
1 Like
didnt know that about the guns. nice. tho the Kranvagn would have had a different autoloader than the SAV. more like the french AMX series.
Again i was supporting the claim that it is likely they could’ve pulled off the 3.0 loader. Additionally both Kran chassis had a diff engine with the AKV 151 having a better power to weight than the current Bkan which runs on an extended strv 103 chassis.
yeah, Boofers have managed to do some crazy shit throughout the years. (my favourite is the 120mm autoloaded AA gun), so i dont doubt they could have pulled it off.
Sweden really has a void from 4.0 to 6.7 where there’s just nothing really there so its going to suffer from having no lineup more than in game potential. I can see this thing taking on a german team solo with how good sweden players are on average. although there’s going to be more one and two death leavers because there wont be a fallback tank
If the Kran was added it would be a dreams come true event which again doesnt solve the problem of a heavy tank for sweden. Also it could be classed a TD depending on which Kran doc you read
Its why i am against this thing, the KV-1B has better side armor and sits at a lower br where sweden has a lineup. If the T34 76 747 was added and the STU 40 maybe it could be nice
This thing is pointless because of it not having a lineup. And im not gonna put a even worse r3 on that sits at 5.3 for some reason. Ill still take a yestervark at 4.3 any day if i could whoch is also why i was partially against a light tank being used as spaa when finland has a Sisu 150 itk with a 23mm gun in the back.
1 Like
the ystervark is a very funny vehicle to play I’m with you on that. not many kills other than planes but you make people so mad by tracking them and running away
Yeah, my biggest gripe with gaijin is not adding linups with these types of vehicles, which is whybi stated finland isn’t worth to play on finland when you can have a better and more finnish linup on germany that finland itself. Ive seen enough people hate on sweden cause of top tier but i play lower BR’s more cause top tier is boring imo. The confirmation of the KV-1B not going to finland hurts cause its essentially like having a core tank to a nation just not be there. The Klimis were the only 2 heavy tanks in finnish service and are the some of the biggest help during the Continuation War.
Spoiler
I mean this was literally during the war as the KV-1A was coming from the west to reach their allies with the 3rd Battalion
1 Like
Wow, i cannot complete daily tasks, how important (no).
Just switch to other nation, stop asking for adding more clones.
The sweden tree got the Tiger 2 despite it never being a service tank, nothing more than a range target, noting of real notability, it wasn’t like Tiger 131 or the tiger 2 US armoured forces used for a while so its nice to see a tank of actual importance to a nation in the tree get represtented
Sweden is not much better than Germany at top tier, they just have a higher standard of player, making them impossible to deal with. and at low tier you get sealclubbers in the SAV making low tier unplayable many. The hate is understandable
I still think the tiger 2 was added to make up for the fact that wed never get the KV-1B, and ive stated over and over i didnt care about the tiger 2 i wanted my finnish tanks not a tank that belonged in the scrapyard.
1 Like
I personally don’t have this issue, i have completed the Swedish tree and almost all of USA ground.
BUT it being an issue at all is not good.
not important, but it shouldn’t be an issue to begin with however small it might be.
Just because an issue is small doesn’t mean i’m not allowed to bring it up.
I didn’t ask for more clones, just that at least one of those that are already there to be in main tree and not premiums/event vehicles
Facts
Vote: Vote: Shouldnt Finland-Sweden tree be on axis side in ww2 era ground simulator battles?
Finland/sweden vote to be in axis side in ww2 I-III rank simulator battles. Not just from historical sense but there is pretty much finland/sweden fighting finland in german tree. And now it will be literally Finnish KV 1 in german tree fighting Finish KV 1 in swedish/finland tree.
vs
