The T34 is good but its still a long reload heavy unlike the tiger II which sit around 8s reload for the most part the US may have a good lineup but its held down from the average US player being extremely new and therefore clueless on most maps
Sweden doesnt need a tiger II instead they could recieve the KV-1A or Churchill III both would sit at a br that wont completely make sweden the best 6.x overall since their 4.x lineup is average
T26E5 imo is the best 6.7, overall the 6.7 US lineup is very strong and the average player isnt as skilled as someone who has played multiple nations, trust me US teams are very “particular” in their skills. I still think its the easiest to play for a new player also.
T-26E5 is only good against new players anyone with half a brain knows its not just a pershing besides its gun is poor
me, sweden main, has to admit that the 4.x lineups of the sweden contain several capable tank destroyers even some lower in br have no problem piercing through 4.7
If you checked my comments i said the tiger 2 was a bad choice. Its a range taget and shouldnt be added. Smin stated they they may add the KV-1b but given how long its been and we have yet to receive a finnish KV-1 its pretty clear they didnt wa t to add the easiest option available and would rather add something that was going to be controversial
That hurts, i am quite fond of the Pershing’s, M26 my beloved
The disparity in treatment and favoritism towards certain nations is surprising. Sweden in particular benefits not only from the Finnish (and Norwegian) sub-tree, but after helicopters experimented only in tests, now we have this thing that spits out. I don’t know if this gimmick is more ridiculous or the imaginary Japanese F-16
This makes the lineup alongside 3 other tanks for a 4 vehicle lineup.
@paolgand1975
Favoritism implies different standards.
Tiger II is identical standards since 2012.
Trial’d vehicles are identical standards since 2012.
so the whole helicoter thing is, as good they might be in grb so bad they are in the heli mode because of thier lack of huge amount of dump rockets
The Tiger 2 was more than just a range target, it was returned to operating condition and undertook terrain and mobility tests before breaking its suspension.
But to me this doesn’t count as service evaluation. There was no armament used, no direct comparison with other types.
Imo it was little more than if the vehicle was recovered from a battlefield and dissected by engineers before placing in a museum - and if that’s the way new additions are heading then it’s a difficult trend to defend as there’s a huge list of such vehicles that sit in modern collections that would qualify for inclusion even though they were never fully evaluated in regards to combat performance, nor ever onsidered for purchase or service,
Glass half full?..if Sweden really needs a heavy tank for game tasks and challenges then it’s going to be a short list of options, and at least the Tiger 2 isn’t going to spread around too many other nations.
I literally do not play Sweden. Why should someone be forced to grind a second nation just to play a stupid battlepass? All nations should have at least one vehicle of each type.
as i allready said here, as far as i remember there was no battlepass task assigned to a heavy, and dailys are actually able to be achieved without a heavy, change mode, arcade realistic sim, or go plane
There is a challenge called “Slow but steady” or something that requires heavy tank kills. There are also times when you have to get kills in diverse vehicle types to complete battle pass challenges.
except the US have more heavy tanks at 6.7 than any other nation, so they dont need more 6.7 heavies.
they also dont need foreign tanks squeezed into their tree bc they have an abundant mass of native designs.
got into the game where a guy nuked easy with it. It’s still a 6.7 6.0 sec reload bmp with 300mm pen.
no, they dont need to become germany 3. just give them more native designs. so many options there, maybe next update there will be something other than an SPAA
i played it, as sweden main, it did not play easy, no depression no rocket, so me personally thinks it is placed balanced, and if you search long enough there will be a video of any tank getting a nuke
They don’t, but they are able to be converted into the attack version. The model is the UH-60M, which can be converted into an assault/attack version.
The more viable option would be to give Sweden the Finnish Helicopters anyway, like the Mi-4AV and Mi-8.
I know this is Wikipedia; but it’s the best source of Finnish army aviation/helicopters I could find.
or, you know… play more than one nation up to rank III.
whenever i hear “X nation doesn’t have a heavy for the daily task” I always wonder why people dont just pick up another nation up to any lineup with a heavy that works for a task. it doesn’t take that long to get to a KV-1, Tiger, ARL, or M6.
or just reroll the task for a negligible amount of silver.