the issue is that Sweden as a tree does currently not have ANY heavies in the tree making daily tasks/BP challenges requiring heavies impossible without paying real money.
So at least one should be in the tree (even if it is a copy paste) just for the sake of opening up for the possibility of completing tasks.
In general i am against copy paste but in that case i would approve as it would serve a purpose.
I dont believe any of the turrets or guns were made. I know 2 hulls were made since they were used to test the suspension system of the strv 103 and the AKV 151(bandkanon) the problem is the turret and gun never actually were made. There were plans to mount the cent mk 10 turret but funding was ended before they could.
What? just because KV1 there is like this one doesnt mean it’s from WoT.
“hey it’s guy from fortnite” or “hey it’s skdi t*t game/guy” logic.
Would be cool if they added that one short 122mm KV prototype tho.
I’m not really that read up on it though so i might be very wrong. But instinctually it looks like there is enough info for Gaijin to be able to have it in the game (since the hull was actually built and tested to the extent it was).
yeah I know, that’s the point of what I said. I’m disappointed it’s premium, but I’ll still probably get it anyways because I have money.
The point is they know people want a Finnish KV-1, so they make it premium, and then people like me buy it because why not, even though I can just grind the Russian tech tree ones.
At this point sweden isn’t the main nation in the swedish tech tree, I only see in battles T-34,Pz.IV,Comet,Pt,T-34-85, Charioteer mk VII,T-54,T-55,T-72 and all the leopard 2A_ the Bkan and the soviet Double barrel Monster, i don’t see any swedish tank play with or angainst sweden, I go search best sweden tech-tree war thunder a reddit dissucion comes up talking about the pzIV and the T-34 What’s the point of play sweden ?
One of the reasons is that the Swedish tier III is kind of weak. with all the oddball SPGs and notsogreat “tanks”. So the Finnish sub-tree gives it a collection of ol’ reliables players can use instead.
I see your point, but there are other ways, to solve this problem, like offering alternative task if you play techtree without necessary vehicle classes, or option to play heavy from another tech tree, or making tasks less reliant on vehicle classes, or whatever.
I like when a tech tree has personality and not necessarily following same template as every other tech tree.
Many of the guns tested weren’t the planned guns, the main gun for the Emil was the 155mm gun but they did do testing with the 105 from another vehicle. Additionally we can assume the projected 3.0 reload would be possible considering bofors and the SAV 20.12.48
These are the only two chassis’ that were tested. After the strv 103 testing was done it was stripped and placed in the museum. The AKV 151 is also in storage with the bkan turret.
Premium doesn’t really matter otherwise id say 4.3 germany is the best lineup in game a ton of very strong event and premium hold that lineup very well. Again rank III sweden doesnt hold a candle to many others aside from maybe japan but im biased cause 3.7 japan (yes chaffe with other 3.0-3.3) vehicles imo is super fun.
half built. two hulls where done and driveable. gun is debated on if it was built or not. but turret wasnt made, we dosnt even really know what it actually looked like, (probably like WoT’s Kranvagn actually) before the project was canceled in favour of buying Centurions and making Strv 103’s.
one hull was later converted to the Bkan 1 prototype and still exists at Arsenalen Museum.
the other is still around too. but not out on display i think.