Noted for the future interactions
Id argue its because it will affect a notable subset of the player base.
That being people who play above 11.3 Air.
For everyone else its “boring”
Here’s something for future interactions: Du bist rattenscharf. Do with it what you will.
More of a general issue regarding WW1/2 and their consequences for British and French economy.
Oh, thank you :). Jokes aside i will remeber it
Bitte schön.
To be fair you would also have to devide that majority into people who are still grinding for top tier and people who just don’t want to play top tier at all.
Zerstörer 45 when?
2 Likes
Yes
1 Like
the Core playerbase
whats so diffrent about Z45 compared to the others?
wtpu doesnt represent the whole community either and look what we got, a roadmap
And for the core playerbase, some core capability coverage in areas like SPAA would be nice.
The gaping 5.0 to 7.0 gap in dedicated spaa for many nations being filled would help a lot of players
Both of these were suggested by community. Theres also little to nothing modern in them. T72B2 would be better than T72B3 being many years earlier, same can be said about if Object 640, Object 187 (starting from 3rd model), modernizations of T80U.
Wirbelwind with 4 30mm if that is the thing they are talking about
I thought they were talking about a boat
WTPU didn’t have much to do with that. Most of the review bombing was already happening at the time of their creation and Gaijin collected seperate feedback.
Only thing they organized was the boycott that failed massively.
2.3 Ground USSR premium tree (joking)
Both Dagger and Avangard are ballistic missiles, and hypersonic speed for ballistic missiles is not any know-how.
Even the V-2 was hypersonic.
We got the roadmap from the negative steam reviews. The War Thunder Player Union was just content creators trying to piggyback off it and pretend like it was their idea.
1 Like