I do not have a source, however every singular picture I have seen of not only the Kfir C.10 B60, but also the normal Kfir C.10 and Kfir 2000 never had above 4 AAMs. Hell, I don’t even think there was ever a Kfir with over 4 AAMs. All those different pylons are for things like bombs, targeting pods, ECM pods, etc…
6 Likes
Yes but maybe it can take more and there isnt a photo for that it makes since even more in the last upgraded kfir
That’s not how it works really. This aircraft only has 4 mounting point for the rails which can carry AAMs. All other hard points are specifically for mounting other ordinance types.
9 hardpoints, not 9 pylons.
It can carry an assortment of pylons on its multiple hard points, however the aircraft is only capable of mounting up to 4 LAU-7 Rails for AAM mounting purposes. This is similar to the Kfir C.7 the C.10 upgrade is based on, as it was upgraded to carry 4 AAMs as opposed to the predecessor Kfir C.2’s count of 4 AAMs.
Its 4 missiles, nothing more I’m afraid.
5 Likes
Well at least give us the python 4 :(
1 Like
The book I shared with you the other day is quite reliable, they are Latin American sources, if it doesn’t say anything about more than 4 missiles or if there is no photo of more than 4 missiles then the answer is obvious
2 Likes
I pray they do. It never even used the Python 3 lmao.
8 Likes
Is there a bug report thread up yet?
This is close enough, I guess
2 Likes
Kfir TC.10 upgraded to Block 60 and outfitted EL/M-2052 AESA radar like Kfir C.10 Block 60 ?
I don’t beleive such a TC.10 exists yet. I mean, it costs a bunch of money to upgrade aircraft, and the TC.10s are used for air to ground and trainer purposes in Colombian service. If a program to modernize the TC.10s to TC.10 Block 60 standard occurs well likely hear about it.
2 Likes
No it actually doesn’t the kfir c10 gets a newer engine. It’s also lighter then the kfir c7 of you do any sorta research so it should actually be better then the kfir c7 in speed and maneuverability
1 Like
They’re the same thrust wise, as far as I know it should just have better reliability, other engines like RD-33 do similar stuff.
2 Likes
Same empty mass currently.
Also the engines are the same: J79-GE-J1E.
Though in-game it’s incorrectly claiming to be the GE-17 on the Kfir C2.
4 Likes
The C10 should start appearing in matches tomorrow, correct?
Yep
I am done with the Kfir C.10 Got it right now ;-)
BR 13.0 wow, thats tough
6 Likes
its tough in 13.0 because of the low missile count and the lack of IRCCM missile for low flying targets that abuse multipath also if you end up in a close range engaments the Python-3 ia not going to save you so much they are practically not worth of chosing it instead of 4 derbys in 13.0 most of the time the Python-3s are going to be dead weight under the wings, if atleast you can have 2 Python-4 for close quarters it would be good and more suitable for the BR it have right now, we need to remember that practically most of 13.0 have 2 to 6 IRCCM missiles and also better FM and more CMs and in some cases FOX-3 with IRCCM missiles and a very good amount of missiles. lets see what happens but right now its still early to have a good conclusion because the matchmaker is not ready yet, the real problem is going to appear when all the people finally claim the C.10 and start to use it a lot it would most likely face %70 to %80 of the time uptiers. i still dont know why the added specifically the Block 60 variant if they are going to artificially limiting it to Python-3 and normal derbys, when it should have at the very least Python-4s and I-Derby, also right now it does not have MAWS, and also the canopy is still wrong its a clearly symptom that the jet is %100 not ready, also why is this thing at 12.7 in GRB?!?!?!
3 Likes
Really couldn’t go any lower…
Why is the BR of Kfir C.10 so high in ground battle? - Game Discussion / Realistic Battle - War Thunder — official forum
yep，and i just make a post about it 12.7 ground br
1 Like