iirc, no datalink = infinite datalink, if you mean like the thing with guiding ARH stuff
Same thing applies to things like the AV-8B
Don’t think that statement still holds true however, afaik the viggen Di was a pain train without that stat.
This I believe will be the same ( at least it’s not a brick)
1 Like
Eh, worst case scenario would be bug reports, but it should have datalink.
1 Like
I’ve honestly lost hope for that site and the system.
Hey if it gets pushed thru then good, very good. I wouldn’t be thanking the devs but a higher force up above but still.
Pls gaijoobs?
4 Likes
I’ve tried this ingame and that’s unfortunately not how it works. No datalink means no datalink. It may have been different at one point in time, but it’s very much like this now.
1 Like
i think they wont add it, because this missile is most op in game even with trash config (it has all 225 sp fuel impulse when the python 3 had 230 for example) but even with this python now have 6-7 km no escape zone.
irl the impulse of the nd 10 probably near 250 and no escape zone when firing at 700kmh target must be 9 km
also this thing rn have both methods of irccm so ingame it will be the unflareble smokeless r27et
1 Like
brother you tested the Python-4 in a user mission?, you are very wrong the Python-4 cannot reach a target in full pursuit at 5km or more above mach 1, the claim of being a unflarable with the hypermega range of the R-27ET is wrong XD, you are the typical guy who goes to the spreadsheet of the missiles and see similar stats between missiles and proceeds to false claim about something that is not like that, you are literally forgetting the part were the missile code enters in discussion and how its programed in the game XD
look at this comparatives and if you have a good capacity for analysis you will understand that what you are saying is wrong.
5 Likes
From what I understand the C10 currently has the wrong engine, it has the J79-GE-17 and it should have the J79-GE-J1E.
2 Likes
NEZ is starting from 0/4
python now have same NEZ as r77
where i said it has it now?
I perfectly know how its works
if you dissagre go to flare aim9m in arcade mode and explain me the results
what is currently in game
v = 1300 V/V ratio is 1
h=1000
0/4
what would be at 245 sp
stop seeing the stats the stats does not tells you all mate, goo and do for your own the test like i did when you finally made that came back here and we can continue debating this, am not gonna waste my time in a guy who just see numbers and dont do tests. and no you dont know how this all works.
also if you didnt know the Python-4 have a declared effective kill range of 25km head-on, on non manouvering targets and a 10km tail-on on non manouvering targets and this is from official sources (Rafael), compared to the declared effective kill range of the R-27ET that is between 50-55km in head on, on non manouvering targets and a maximum of 20-23km tail-on on non manouvering targets, all of this is taking in count the perfect launch conditions. both missiles in-game are underperforming a lot and this is not new it happens and it happened with all the missiles that got added to the game specially the IR ones.
1 Like
wet dreams
both missiles have sim effective flight range 8-9 km in 4/4 on ground level due no atmosphere thurst increase.
missile flight range at ground level depends only from engine work time
who saying?
at what alt
what target type
what speed
i told you am not gonna debate with some one that does not have any aknowledge about this and also does not have any aknowledge about israeli missiles and just make false claims seeing just numbers in a spreadsheet and does not put anything in practice like you should. at this point you might be a troll trying to missinform people what a shame.
1 Like
I don’t mind battle rating up to 13.7 and gajin add 2x Python 4
2 Likes
no, oom 13.7 its to much just for 2 missile, 13.0 or 13.3 is perfect, take in count that with higher the BR more mediocre would be the jet even with just 2 good IR missiles, and also the solution is not reducing his br too because it would face 11.7 in a down tier soo… the perfect BR placement is 13.0-13.3 no more than that even with just 2 Python-4.
3 Likes
It should be able to carry 4x Derby
2 Likes
It can, the stock loadout only include 2 of them for stock grinding purposes iirc.
1 Like
Sweet, wonder if it could ever carry 6 air to air ordnance of any kind. Supposedly “upgraded” From C.7, right?
1 Like
There’s only the 4 same hardpoints to my knowledge
Also yes, Python 4 and Derby are both compatible on the same pylon