Just How Bad is the US SPAA Line?

That’s true, but resupply near a friendly capture point is always an option.

Not really. I play AB, and the Bkan is easily the best SPAA at its tier- its truly astounding. Amazing velocity, and it can nuke any tank that tries to fight it, too.

Hull rotates well too.

We’re really talking about GRB here, not GAB.

GAB has the lead indicator, its a good view of what it would be like in this new GRB.

Something that older players may not want, as it’s getting closer and closer to GAB lol

Vocal Minority™ moment.

Not going to lie- you are one of the most friendly players ive seen to the AB perspective, and I dont get any judging from you on it, which I am glad to see.

Its nice simply being able to discuss these things civilly.

I think ABs is fine, although there is a stigma (with good reason) about it, in which only noobs play it. There is a reason why bullet drop, aim assist, pen indicator, and enemy markers exist in AB, which is to help the player do what they have to do.

Ehhh…

Go play AB in a light, and you will see it isnt all sunshine and roses, same with AAB. Its just different imo, and a lot of RB players forget that AB is the majority of players.

Pen indicator lies, and enemy markers is a double-edged sword- your enemies get it too.

And we do have one place where we can claim total superiority in skill, and thats top tier AAB. shudders in the horrors of VPO

I’m not saying that players there are always less skillfull. It’s just that typically, less experienced players play it in order to learn the game, and understand key concepts about bullet drop, armour, tank / aircraft identification, and positioning. Then there are also seal clubbers that go to AB just to bully those players. But there are other skills that you need to learn in AB that is mostly separate to RB (like reaction time). And top tier AAB sounds awful to me (and a lot other RB mains). From what I can tell, it’s just non-stop cesspools with a sprinkle of competent players who hide behind their team and geograhical cover to rearm their missiles.

Ah, yeah.

Top Tier AAB is the horrors of war due to a pair of squadrons absolutely dominating it, (VPO and GUUD). Aoeilaeiepae (The only TYAAB YT’r) shows a pretty good idea of what its like.

And in the words of that man:

“Welcome to top tier, the jungle speaks AIM-9M.”

I agree. Also the R3 T20 and XM800T are fairly analogous. Both were designed to be light reconaissance vehicles, not SPAA.

1 Like

still too trash to justify even having it in your lineup

Personaly I much prefer the TCM-20 over the M16

I mean, it’s just how you look at it and your opinion of it. I think it’s worth it, doesn’t mean you do. I’d rather have an AA that can put up a wall of fire and has pretty good turret traverse then one with slowish constant fire and bad turret traverse. I also can’t aim super well with 40mm’s so that doesn’t help either

Well that’s not in the US TT is it?

US still needs new spaa. The m16 won’t cut it, can’t you all see??? Any prototypes will work.

At present, the winning rate of the top GRB in the United States is the lowest, and ADATs should be changed to the score of an air defense vehicle.

Winrates mean literally nothing, please stop trying to use them as reasoning.

There are people like you who love rebuttal everywhere. Is the lowest win rate meaningless? Shouldn’t it be buffed? Does SPAA get the birth score of TD makes sense?