Actual dogshit take , A2G armament got nothing to do with the jet performance in A2A combat. How desperate a person must be to use this , it is like saying EF/Rafael got good A2G armament meaning they have piss poor air performance. Who would have thought , when jet play in their main role they thrive ???
5 Likes
He was arguing about stats. So I provided a counter point of why j7d KDR may be inflated higher than it may look like, compared to other planes.
Mig 21bis lazur M has higher SL earning on average despite much lower KB, which means people bombed in them, lowering its KB.
very overstated factor here
3 Likes
So a) you agree J7D should move up based on its A2A ability to 11.0
Or b) give it napalms and give it the “bomber” treatment ala the Q5 series and move it up to 11.0 based on its bombing ability
Radio call " I Agree"
3 Likes
Bait used to be believable.
I think this is a non stated factor that should be considered too.
2 Likes
Gimme this.
Mig23MLD 11.7 has 1.33kd
Mig23MLA 11.7 has 1.14kd
Mig23M. 11.0 has 1.01kd
Mig23ML. 11.7 has 1.00kd
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Man, I really hate this forum and Gaijin’s approaches about balancing planes.
Especially when I see ridiculous claims like ‘J-7D can’t be 11.0 because it doesn’t have napalm’
Everyone knows, even Anton might know that bombing capability can affect nothing about winning 11.0BR+ match in ARB.
Because the current ARB system is somewhat similar to a fighter-heaven-like TDM.
And there is no airfield destruction victory, or winning by ticket from ground targets is having low chance.
Then, why should J-7D be 10.7, because it can’t carry any worthwhile bombs
While Tornado IDS(with targeting pods) need to be 11.7 because it can carry the worthless guided bomb.
When J-7D can easily eat Tornado IDS alive and contribute a victory way superior?
(I picked tonka for example, because of nothing but personal preference. you can put any strike aircraft which can do nothing but a half-baked fighter jet in this mode in this place. MiG-27 or Su-24… and some others)
Man, blaming the non-extensiveness of napalm for keeping J-7D to 10.7BR is one of the most ridiculous takes if we consider both the current status of ARB and strike aircraft coutnerparts.
I know it is bait but i just can’t ignore it :/
It really should be reverted to 11.0.
even if we just consider nothing but the total amount of PL-8, which they can compare to the 10.7 counterparts.
“But J-7D don’t have any radar missiles and napalm”
[Me laughing in Tonka which also has none of the radar missile and napalm but has 1.0 higher BR]
6 Likes
The mig 23 series are truly interesting. Stomps on a downtier, more or less completely in a uptier with its horrible radar.
Your rating with F-4E…
1 Like
Like the J-7D. Lmao
Idk if you are joking or not ngl, but this might sound crazy; i played those 11 games 4 years ago, never touched it again, may just do it now to get up that rating)))
The joke is your phrase with the rating of many of your vehicles
1 Like
0 kills in 11 battles. Youre a useless player in your own words
1 Like
What i meant is that you cant say if X plane is op or not if you have a bad rating on said plane, not on ANY plane that you ever played
You haven’t talked about any specific model. You’ve said what you’ve said. That’s what happens when your own words turn against you 😆
In fact you wrote on ANY plane 😂
1 Like
I sure did, but not on that context
1 Like
In what other context? Don’t hurt yourself anymore
1 Like
I just explained to you on what context:
Also, yeah, about that
2 Likes