Mig23MLD 11.7 has 1.33kd
Mig23MLA 11.7 has 1.14kd
Mig23M. 11.0 has 1.01kd
Mig23ML. 11.7 has 1.00kd
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Man, I really hate this forum and Gaijin’s approaches about balancing planes.
Especially when I see ridiculous claims like ‘J-7D can’t be 11.0 because it doesn’t have napalm’
Everyone knows, even Anton might know that bombing capability can affect nothing about winning 11.0BR+ match in ARB.
Because the current ARB system is somewhat similar to a fighter-heaven-like TDM.
And there is no airfield destruction victory, or winning by ticket from ground targets is having low chance.
Then, why should J-7D be 10.7, because it can’t carry any worthwhile bombs
While Tornado IDS(with targeting pods) need to be 11.7 because it can carry the worthless guided bomb.
When J-7D can easily eat Tornado IDS alive and contribute a victory way superior?
(I picked tonka for example, because of nothing but personal preference. you can put any strike aircraft which can do nothing but a half-baked fighter jet in this mode in this place. MiG-27 or Su-24… and some others)
Man, blaming the non-extensiveness of napalm for keeping J-7D to 10.7BR is one of the most ridiculous takes if we consider both the current status of ARB and strike aircraft coutnerparts.
I know it is bait but i just can’t ignore it :/
It really should be reverted to 11.0.
even if we just consider nothing but the total amount of PL-8, which they can compare to the 10.7 counterparts.
“But J-7D don’t have any radar missiles and napalm”
[Me laughing in Tonka which also has none of the radar missile and napalm but has 1.0 higher BR]
5 Likes
The mig 23 series are truly interesting. Stomps on a downtier, more or less completely in a uptier with its horrible radar.
Your rating with F-4E…
1 Like
Like the J-7D. Lmao
Idk if you are joking or not ngl, but this might sound crazy; i played those 11 games 4 years ago, never touched it again, may just do it now to get up that rating)))
The joke is your phrase with the rating of many of your vehicles
1 Like
0 kills in 11 battles. Youre a useless player in your own words
1 Like
What i meant is that you cant say if X plane is op or not if you have a bad rating on said plane, not on ANY plane that you ever played
You haven’t talked about any specific model. You’ve said what you’ve said. That’s what happens when your own words turn against you 😆
In fact you wrote on ANY plane 😂
1 Like
I sure did, but not on that context
1 Like
In what other context? Don’t hurt yourself anymore
1 Like
I just explained to you on what context:
Also, yeah, about that
2 Likes
So? You still have black, red, orange, and yellow ratings with lots of planes. So, according to your statements and logic, you’re still absolutely mediocre as a player
1 Like
2 Likes
Considering you’ve made an absolute fool of yourself, and I play as a bomber and attacker, and I haven’t even said your ridiculous line and haven’t even fought more than 25,000 battles as you did. Are you trying to tell me something? That you’re absolutely mediocre, having fought 44 battles with P-400 and just as many other planes with black, red and orange rating?
I told you dont hurt yourself more 😆
1 Like
Lmao
1 Like
Bait used to be believable
1 Like
1 Like
This kind of makes me wish sites like Stat Shark et all had filters for ranks or groups of ranks.
You can look at per vehicle rating, but it’s not really the same - it doesn’t communicate consistency as well (even though looking at top 10/20 most played planes should be pretty telling) nor can you filter only last month’s data.
Flying jets vs props, or even gunfighter jets vs BVR are so different environments, it’s kind of crazy the stats from one affect the stats on the other.
Missile thunder eludes me, for instance. I love my props. Occasionally I feel like jets though and I throw hard.
4 Likes