This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
nah, man, you are delusional for this. PL-12 is like 3rd best missile after mica and 77-1, but J-10C lack in million other things, like mythical extra drag, wrong 3d model, wrong engine, unfinished and bugged hud and hmd, and lack of supposed a2g weapons
8 Likes
We need more decomp, cause neither the J10 or Gripen are Rafale/EFT good. 14.3 is just super compressed. We need at least 15.0
1 Like
Nah I put it right below the derby. Literally not even that great, I’d take Derby over it any day. It’s literally only slight better than the R-Darter.
how’s it worse than r darter/derby lol
PL-12s are better than AIM-120C-5s
2 Likes
So you want a downgrade missile like the C-5?
1 Like
The problems with the J10C are numerous, starting with the incorrect 3D modeling; basically, they copied the J10A model and only changed the air intake.
The engine is also another big problem; Gaijin simply refuses to give the WS10B to the J10C.
The radar is also heavily nerfed; they gave it the initial version of the KLJ-7A AESA. In fact, they not only included the initial version but also used the 3D model of the KLJ-7A from the JF-17 Block III.
The drag coefficient of the J10C is also abysmal.
His CAS loadout is also incorrect.
4 Likes
Did you guys speak up about this while it was on the dev server for weeks?
Yes, I created 2 topics and commented on several others.
Several bug reports were made, but none were accepted. On the day of the patch, I made two more posts and commented on several others, and I am fully aware that they will not resolve this in less than two patches.
As always happens with Chinese and Israeli vehicles.
I don’t know why, but these two nations are the children that the gaijin doesn’t like.
Edit: The Chinese community’s outrage over this game isn’t without reason, I’m not even Chinese, but the gaijin really messed with the Chinese vehicles.
5 Likes
the dev server isn’t final it’s impossible to know what changes will be made when it comes to the live, do you usually report issues about products you’ve yet to receive?
you’re literally just playing a different game, the seeker is literally the same, pl12s are better than aim120s because it can actually pull enough g loads to be useful in wvr while only being slightly worse for bvr.
And that’s where you have AIM-9Ms, PL-8Bs can’t do anything close range.
pl8bs are still good similar to magic 2s as they’re gate width irccm so they’re gonna be slightly less reliable but they still have faster acceleration and a slightly better g limit than the aim9m.
The acceleration is the problem, it’s too high right off the rail for it to be usable in dogfights.
Once the missile tracks via its own seeker your radar input means nothing
Even if you maintain a lock it provides 0 benefit to the missile
So you’re telling me the missile will automatically track at 100 KM?
Not quite true, if the missile loses lock it will rely on datalink updates.
Oh my god you are clueless :(
2 Likes
TWS guides the missile through datalink updates :) The missile doesnt have kinetic 100km range though.