It's time for Gaijin to finally fix the Challenger 2 instead of carrying all it's issues over into each new tank

Dev Server "Air Superiority" General Discussion
13

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ZtsHpZbAeyow
And if you want to start doing Challenger 1

2 Likes
14

That looks like all the recent reports from the past 24 hours ish

4 Likes
15

I think it’s VERY telling there’s a lot of topics regarding Challenger 2 than any other i’ve seen. There’s an abundance of information that’s been submitted to Gaijin (see the monsterous list above) and nothing is being done, while new content builds off an error filled foundation.

It’s gotten to the point now where your own tech mods are voicing concerns about this, while still planning to charge $70USD for an unfinished and erronious product.

@Smin1080p (sorry you’re the only CM i’m aware of to tag), surely you’ve got a direct line of communication internally that you can pass on this disastifaction, like we’ve seen with the recent JAS39A to Sweden, but C for UK? In the same way as the outcry got forwarded on and a statement was made letting us know C is also going to Sweden, can you pass on this massive issue to the devs for comment?

11 Likes
16

Shall leave that for someone else ;D

2 Likes
17

But as for the actual topic: Yeah its insane that their solution to the last 5 CR2s is a prototype CR3 so they can just give it a bigger engine and different ammo. Even though the CR2s could be a really good tank if they fixed even 20% of the bug reports. Not too mention them all

2 Likes
18

We are trying to figure the tes/oes backplate on the
Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion if any of you want to come

2 Likes
19

Fixing just those issues would certainly be a big help

2 Likes
20

All dev server threads are automatically passed on anyway. Luckily devs will spend nearly the entire month of January fixing things so there’s some hope.

4 Likes
21

I hope you’re right, man…

1 Like
22

Lets hope dont spend the entire month of the US and USSR vehicles

2 Likes
23

I would like my challengers to be competitive. Don’t even need to be as incredibly effective as they are in reality, just competitive. I’d take it being fully proper, but even just competitive at this point.

7 Likes
24

Biggest one I’d like to see fixed is the hull side armour. Probably one of the oldest issues reported on CR2.

18 Likes
25

Yep, and one of the most proven.

3 Likes
26

I literally opened all the links, and the response was just ‘Forwarded as a suggestion.’ This mobility issue affects only the Challenger 2, which seems like a heavy tank. In my opinion, it’s a simple problem to fix, but Gaijin doesn’t want to. This kind of issue should be fixed immediately, not just forwarded as a suggestion; it’s an error, not a suggestion, and it’s straightforward to resolve.

3 Likes
27
28

Plz fix it!!!

29

That’s weird.

My understanding is what we are getting is not a challenger 3 prototype, it’s not be unveiled yet.

As far as I’m aware, the black night had just as much right to be called the challenger 3 prototype as what we are getting.

I guess marketing triumphs over all, gotta get the headline “challenger 3!!” In.

4 Likes
30

This is extremely important IMO.

500-520mm KE is useless… but 580-600mm KE would be amazing.

Those 80mm really would change the tank.

5 Likes
31

Just post it onto the Russian forums, probably will help more than anything else lmao

2 Likes
32

Already posted too many times. About all Challenger problem

3 Likes