It was also a lower BR absolute dogging on tanks that couldnt fight back.
sure, so lets drop the SP of jets with fox-3 to the same level as SPAA
4 Likes
We need better AAs as plenty of people won’t have top tier jets researched and others might not even enjoy playing air at all.
The 15E is the best for grb due to the multirole capability , the EF2000 and raf are fantastic for pure cap
Lets be quite honest theres always people going to absolutely cry their heads off that X vehicle isnt some untouchable death machine.
Reality wise, if USA got a more.modern/ effective spaa (which it should, as well as other natioms) it would be one, if not, the best trees in game now
1 Like
Nah. Even though it’s a combined arms gamemode, CAS should always be at least at a slight disadvantage compared to CAP/SPAA in ground RB.
So either they should add massively better SPAA systems or they should make CAP loadouts much much cheaper.
42 single plane and 60g dual plane
1 Like
I really didn’t, but maybe I missed it, feel free to repeat it and I’ll address it
The second half of my comment wasn’t really at you specifically
Again, for the record, if I try harded the T80UM2 it would easily be my best tank. But I don’t try hard it because I don’t like having an unfair advantage, that’s why I play the PSO and 2A6 over the 2A7, or the Ariete over the 2A7HU.
I know you can’t relate or understand the above so it really is just for the record.
Yes which isnt in game yet ? Or did they add dual plane?
So, you directed this at @БЕИ , when he literally did not mention you at all, another unwarranted insult you are throwing at another forum member, trying to take the moral or intellectual high ground by saying that they cant relate or understand.
Why? what is the need for that, the dudes just pointing out the obvious that checking stats allows you to see if a person is actually warranted in what they are saying, at no point were you, or your stats specifically brought up.
You are as @スカサハ said, are not actually address the actual points and arguments people are making, and instead are throwing insults or baseless accusations around which again, you just insulted another forum member for literally no reason.
go back up and read what everyone has said to you then rather than request it be typed out for you again.
Again this is miles off topic and to be honest its quite franky pretty stupid and petty. can we again try get back on topic?
I dont mind debating nuance over US top tier and the tit for tat on what tank is better or worse but this is miles off of what the discussion should be about and its getting out of hand.
1 Like
He made multiple posts about my stats in the T80UM2, context matters (which is why you like removing it)
No he made remarks on it previously.
In the comment you responded to he made no such remarks related to you whatsoever, you took it upon yourself to make it about you.
I removed absolutely no context and explained the same there as here, you are now lying about me, and accusing me now.
Now as ive said upteen times, this is miles, off topic and you are consistently doing your best to stir up bother at this stage.
1 Like
“He made multiple posts about it”
“Nuh-uh he made remarks on it previously”
nuff said
The specifc comment both he responded too, and wrote were not related to you at all.
Neither of that is what was said, again falsifying information aka lying.
You completely ignored as well what I and others are saying about the points on abrams and are specifically throwing around insults and accusations, that are baseless and unfounded.
That comment, was absolutely nothing to do with you but you related it to yourself, thats on you.
I’d suggest if you’ve nothing nice, sensible or on topic to say, then say nothing.
Again ill say this as i want to make sure we all understand that this is, off topic.
1 Like
They’re replies to me or comments about me, I’ll reply if I feel like it even if it triggers you.
You’re on your 5th or 6th wall of text purely about me btw so maybe it’s time to stop projecting the off topic stuff.
TY for the free rent though.
no im responding to you insulting, insunuating and belittling other forum users as if you are morally or intelectually above them.
As you eloquently stated
“I know you can’t relate or understand the above so it really is just for the record.”
so the story goes,
[quote=“ExcaliburSniper, post:1490, topic:140612”]
I get it, the mere suggestion that the game is rigged in your favor is offensive, so of course you’ll respond emotionally, stat check, circlejerk and strawman instead of behaving like adults… and that’s not my problem.
´[/quote]
sn your response to @スカサハ which if you read that correctly you again are still repeating both insults, and accusations. “rigged in your favor”, to a person you have absolutely no idea what nation they play, or where they are from.
Which is a baseless accusation.
This is a complete lie, youve consistently went miles off topic and that back and forth did contain ad hominem if you actually understood what the definition is. heres
example one. and i quote you from start to finish as it begins with a capital on the A, “And the US has by far the worst. But you’re glancing over that. Cool.” this statement in of itself is a passive aggressive remark and falls under the context of ad hominem.
Example two. when @Ion_Protogen infact told you that it does matter that Britain has a worse adats and Isreal has the imp your retort is thusly. “I explained multiple times how it doesn’t and you’ve ignored it every time. Pattern forming.” again ad hominem which is you attacking him on how he is formatting his responses. which BTW from an English teaching perspective are spot on and you are choosing to ignore what he said.
That is just two responses out of many of you having passive aggressive attaacks on folks for disagreeing with you.
I write this because you are infact the one twisting how situations are, and went, and insulting, insinuating, belittle and accusing others and its unjust and no one on the forum comes here to see this malarkey.
again this is still off topic because you objectively are choosing to stir it up , even when the eveidence is there in your own bloody writing.
You are creating strawmen of us, lying too us whilst also insulting us and belittle us, even with the people you claimed to have a mutual discussion with.
why cant you stop?
2 Likes
I detect sarcasm here, but I never said that jets were weak as far as dealing with other jets goes, quite the opposite.
Read the rest of my comment, I brought up how this could be accomplished, this works quite well as not all nations have spaa left to be added.
sadly, it’s easier to do that than to actually type up a response. Why write a paragraph that proves the others point when you can just say nuh uh?
3 Likes
Okay but disadvantaging an entire class of vehicles discourages people from taking them out, ideally in a video game you want all playables to feel good.
I know plenty of people have a chip on their shoulder about how CAS is cowardly and that you should be fighting on the ground fair and square as any proper player would. And to them I say suck it up, that isn’t the game the devs want, so adapt.
1 Like
So am i going insane here or is this dude genuinely just stirring the pot.
Those are just two examples i could go through the full conversation
2 Likes