so now we are just throwing around insults
ad hominem definitely shows everyone how great your intellect is and that you are definitely winning the argument
how this thread feels
so you admit that you just used AI to throw out a formular that you dont understand
and that formular by itself isnt calculating anything
so please atleast explain to us what values need to be put in there and what units
I just quit this thread tbh stop tagging me if you refuse to admit that somehow a mach 24 house can be shot down , a satilite can be shot down from a plane , a mach 3 ARMS can be shot down , then I have nothing else to say but McM is in game nothing you do or say will change it
Using the ASAT as a justification for MCM has to be THE wildest logic leap I think I’ve ever seen
1 Like
it is possible but not with current wt missiles, missiles have substantially different RCS, and drones propellers have a lot more RCS than people make them to be, Radar Range Equation - Radartutorial
so now you are just using red herrings so you dont actually have to engage with the argument anymore
we already got ad hominem, strawman and red herring
gonna collect all of the bad faith argumentation techniques
5 Likes
didnt seem to work
1 Like
just to keep you guys busy I came back look at this! anything you say will not be tagged so yea no use in talking basically
wow so you just admit that you were wrong
and that you dont have any arguments
don’t worry it’s a big forum I’ll find you
so scary
seems like it didnt work again
be kind
Huh?
Literally any fighter has a lower rcs than a B-52
That does not mean they’re stealthy
GeneralEagle being a dumbass again…
i know it is shocking
a fighter jet that is smaller than a strategic bomber, has a smaller rcs than a strategic bomber
1 Like
CRAZZYY
How did I not think of that earlier